Clicky

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z270
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Launched January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Here is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB35F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB35F (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z270 was revealed 6 years earlier than the WB35F and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z270 grades versus the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-Z270 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-Z270

 WB35F EX-Z270 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2009Fresher by 60 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen resolution230k115kCrisper screen (+115k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB35F

 EX-Z270 WB35F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 features physical dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the WB35F.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and WB35F.

To sum up, the two cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung WB35F will offer you more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Portrait photography info
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography info
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
37
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Street photography factors
Samsung WB35F Street photography factors
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB35F Sports photography factors
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect AF
40
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Travel photography features
Samsung WB35F Travel photography features
58
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
70
lighter than competition in class (194g)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z270
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
43
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z270
Vlogging with Samsung WB35F
29
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
31
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (194g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not offer selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z270Samsung WB35F
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z270 Samsung WB35F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-01-08 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.6-7.8 f/3.1-6.3
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 115k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/2 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 111g (0.24 pounds) 194g (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 BP70A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at release $0 $130