Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-Z280 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z280 was revealed 4 years before the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-Z280 matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-Z280 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-Z280
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 40 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-Z280 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z280 offers external dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z280 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The picture here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The EX-Z280 comes with the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder. The more aged EX-Z280 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 115k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 133g (0.29 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $180 | $450 |