Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efead/efeadc926fa641dfb6c25e82a731918fb19ebb47" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-Z280 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-Z280 was introduced 4 years before the EX2F and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z280 matches up against the EX2F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Samsung EX2F
EX-Z280 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 115k | ![]() | 0k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-Z280
EX2F | EX-Z280 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 40 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Samsung EX2F
EX-Z280 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z280 provides outside measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z280 versus the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de7d7/de7d7a7f1d17938b2656cae23bad1600a252722d" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and EX2F is 96 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82425/82425a57a0e0e36da27e3f6d9652d7b9e3739e6b" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z280 and EX2F.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-Z280 has the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow DOF tougher. The older EX-Z280 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2561d/2561d4deabc14c55d69c1523c20e94ed0f286dcd" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5244c/5244c0d655275dc427703566a01784fb949bea82" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 133g (0.29 pounds) | 294g (0.65 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $180 | $478 |