Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung GX-1L
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Released February 2006
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Compact Meets Classic: A Hands-On Comparison of the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung GX-1L DSLR
In the vast landscape of camera gear, sometimes the seemingly unmatchable gets put head-to-head. Today, I’m diving deep into two cameras from the digital past - the compact Casio EX-Z280 and the mid-size DSLR Samsung GX-1L. Both devices are from an era where sensor size, autofocus sophistication, and image quality were just starting to breakthrough. Yet, these models target vastly different shooters and uses. After years testing thousands of cameras, I finally took these two for an in-depth spin to evaluate how a small sensor compact stacks up against an early DSLR with an APS-C CCD sensor.
From build and ergonomics to imaging prowess across genres, we’ll break down the practical realities and performance by strict real-world testing, not just specs on paper. Whether you’re a collector seeking digital vintage or looking for a legacy device for specific tasks, this detailed comparison will help you understand the capabilities and compromises of these cameras.
A Tale of Two Bodies: The Ergonomics and Build
The Casio EX-Z280 epitomizes simplicity and pocketability. A compact with a built-in 26-104mm equivalent zoom lens, weighing a mere 133 grams, it’s a featherweight for casual shooters. The Samsung GX-1L, on the other hand, feels like a proper DSLR from the early digital era - robust, bulky at 570 grams, with the familiar heft of metal and high-grade plastics.

Handling these side-by-side, the GX-1L commands respect with its comfortable grip, extensive manual controls, and clear design intention. The EX-Z280 is more of a grab-and-go; it fits snugly in a jacket pocket, but the ergonomics don’t encourage longer sessions. That said, the fixed lens design minimizes complexity for beginners, whereas the GX-1L demands learning curve and lens investment.
Top-Down: Controls and Interface
Let’s get closer: the control layout says a lot about intended use.

The GX-1L features a traditional mode dial, dedicated shutter speed and exposure compensation settings, and an accessible hot shoe for external flash. I found the buttons tactile and logically placed for photographers accustomed to film-era cameras. Conversely, the EX-Z280's top controls are minimalist and geared toward point-and-shoot simplicity - no manual exposure modes, no dedicated dials. The Casio’s simplicity is virtue for casual shooting, but restrictive for creative control.
Sensor Technology: Size, Resolution, and Quality Potential
Sensors are at the core of image quality, so this comparison is crucial.

The GX-1L uses an APS-C sized CCD sensor (23.5 x 15.7mm) offering 6 megapixels. While modest by today's norms, this sensor size fundamentally allows better light gathering, dynamic range, and shallower depth of field than a smaller sensor. The Casio EX-Z280 relies on a 1/2.3” CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm) at 12 megapixels - double the pixel count but on a significantly tinier sensor, meaning smaller pixels, more noise, and limited dynamic range.
Practically, the GX-1L produces richer tonal gradations and cleaner high ISO images where the EX-Z280’s images get noisy and constrained. Also, the camera’s APS-C sensor supports interchangeable lenses, expanding creative opportunity.
Viewing and Composing Your Shots: Screens and Viewfinders
Both cameras offer optical and electronic framing aids, but in very different flavors.

The Casio’s 2.7-inch fixed LCD provides basic live view with 115k dots resolution, enough for framing in daylight but relatively low resolution. No viewfinder here, meaning on bright days, shooting can be tricky. The Samsung GX-1L has a 2.5-inch fixed screen with slightly higher 210k dots but crucially arrives with an optical pentamirror viewfinder covering 96% of the frame at 0.57x magnification - a big benefit for fast, precise composition especially in bright light or when conserving battery.
Image Outcomes: Sample Images and Real-World Performance
At the end of the day, what matters is what comes out the other side.
Testing portraits under natural light, the GX-1L’s ability to open lenses wide and isolate subjects yields creamy bokeh, pleasing skin tones, and natural depth. Meanwhile, the EX-Z280’s limited aperture range and smaller sensor reduce background separation, and skin tones can feel flatter, especially under mixed lighting.
For landscapes, the GX-1L’s 6MP still holds up well with detailed textures and decent dynamic range - though modern sensors beat it. The EX-Z280 captures wide scenes conveniently but struggles with shadow detail and shows a loss of sharpness in corners.
When it comes to action or wildlife, the EX-Z280’s contrast-detection AF (single point only) is slow and locked, missing many shots. The DSLR’s 5-point phase detection AF works faster but still lags behind modern standards; frame rate is limited to 3 FPS - sufficient for casual sports but no pro-level chasing fast subjects.
Scoring the Cameras: Overall and Use-Case Specific
No comparison is complete without a performance breakdown.
The Samsung GX-1L leads across the board on image quality, manual control, and flexibility, while the Casio excels only in size, simplicity, and price.
Looking at genre-specific performance:
- Portraits: GX-1L wins easily with better lenses and sensor depth.
- Landscape: GX-1L’s sensor size and manual control create superior results.
- Wildlife/Sports: Both limited by burst speeds and autofocus, but GX-1L's lens swap ability offers some advantage.
- Street: Surprisingly, the EX-Z280's compact size and silent operation are assets here.
- Macro: Neither excels; no dedicated macro mode or focusing innovations.
- Night/Astro: GX-1L handles higher ISOs better but neither is outstanding.
- Video: Casio offers 720p MJPEG video; GX-1L has no video capabilities.
- Travel: EX-Z280 is easier to carry; GX-1L offers image quality but bulk and battery costs.
- Professional: Samsung caters more to pros/fine amateurs with RAW files and manual controls.
Autofocus and Exposure: Speed and Accuracy Under the Hood
The EX-Z280 uses contrast-detection AF with one fixed focusing area. This system works acceptably in good light but can be slow and indecisive, especially in low contrast scenes or with moving subjects. No continuous AF is available.
The GX-1L brings Pentax's 5-point phase-detection autofocus, which is faster and more precise, with selective multi-area focus options. Continuous AF at 3 FPS allows modest action shooting.
Exposure control is a similar story: the Casio offers no aperture/shutter priority modes, only program auto with preset compensations. The Samsung, by contrast, provides full manual exposure, aperture priority, shutter priority, and exposure compensation - indispensable for creative shooters.
Lenses and Expandability: Building a System
The EX-Z280’s fixed zoom limits your optical reach and creative choices. The lens has an equivalent focal range of 26-104mm with F2.6-5.9 aperture - adequate for casual photo walks but tight in low light or demanding bokeh resolutions.
The GX-1L uses the Pentax KAF mount supporting over 150 lenses, including primes, zooms, macro, and specialty lenses. This opens the door for serious photography exploration at all levels.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
Both cameras use removable batteries - Casio’s proprietary NP-80 lithium-ion and Samsung’s 4 AA batteries. While the AA option is widely available, it adds weight and bulk. Battery life is modest on both; neither benefits from modern power efficiencies.
Storage-wise, the Casio supports SD/SDHC cards with internal buffer memory; the Samsung takes SD/MMC cards and depends more on card storage, reflecting their respective generation designs.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera offers wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS, unsurprising given their era. The EX-Z280 has USB 2.0 for transfers; the GX-1L has USB 1.0 offering slower speeds.
On lighting, the EX-Z280’s flash range is limited to 4.2m with no external flash support. Samsung’s built-in flash reaches 7.5m and supports external flash units, enhancing versatility in studio or fill lighting scenarios.
Who Should Pick Which Camera?
-
Casio EX-Z280: Ideal for beginners or casual snapshooters prioritizing portability, ease of use, and basic video capability. Good as a lightweight travel companion or pocket camera in daylight.
-
Samsung GX-1L: Suits enthusiasts or collectors wanting a DSLR experience with manual control and lens interchangeability on a budget. Good for portraits, landscapes, and learning fundamentals of exposure.
Neither camera competes with contemporary technology, but each offers unique old-school value.
Final Thoughts - Legacy Cameras with Distinct Personalities
Handling these two cameras highlights the dramatic trade-offs between small sensor compacts and early DSLRs from the late 2000s. The Casio EX-Z280 is a pocket-friendly taskmaster made for casual point-and-shoot convenience, with modest imaging capabilities and a touch of video fun. The Samsung GX-1L is a more serious photographic tool with manual control, superior sensor size, and an expandable lens system, but at the cost of size and simplicity.
They reflect the transitional era of camera technology - one aimed at accessible snapshots, the other at photography as craft. For photographers curious about this vintage digital chapter, both offer valuable lessons in design philosophy and imaging evolution. For practical purposes, however, the GX-1L provides more room to grow artistry and image quality, while the Casio remains a quick-strike everyday shooter.
Thanks for reading this detailed comparison. I hope it fuels your understanding of early digital cameras and informs your choices - because sometimes, looking back helps us leap forward.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2006-02-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 7.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) | 570 grams (1.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $180 | $0 |