Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z280 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the WB250F and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z280 scores against the WB250F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z280 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-Z280
| WB250F | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 40 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z280 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z280 offers exterior measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z280 against the WB250F.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z280 and WB250F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z280 and WB250F.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB250F to deliver more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z280 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-08-31 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 115k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 133g (0.29 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $180 | $250 |
