Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma fp
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Revealed July 2019
- Replacement is Sigma fp L

Compact vs. Full Frame: A Hands-On Comparison of the Casio EX-Z280 and Sigma fp
When it comes to choosing a new camera, the choices can seem dizzying. On one end of the spectrum, you have ultra-affordable, pocket-friendly compacts like the Casio EX-Z280. On the other, there's the pioneering Sigma fp: a tiny full-frame mirrorless camera designed for demanding enthusiasts and professionals. Both have their fans, but if you’re weighing which fits your style, pocket, and photography ambitions, I’ve got you covered with a thorough, real-world comparison.
I’ve personally handled, tested, and put both of these through their paces - despite the decade separating their releases - and I will guide you through their strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases with transparency and practical advice. So let’s dive into how these cameras stack up for every major shooting scenario and technical detail.
Getting a Feel: Size, Ergonomics, and Build Quality
First impressions matter, especially with cameras you’re lugging everywhere or operating under pressure. Let’s talk size and handling.
Casio EX-Z280
Weighing in at a featherlight 133g with compact 97x53x20mm dimensions, the EX-Z280 is an absolute travel and everyday pocket champion. It slips effortlessly into a jacket or purse, and its fixed lens setup takes care of zoom range without lugging extra gear.
The tradeoff? The build feels inexpensive, with plastic predominating, and without weather sealing or protective coatings. Perfect for casual shooters but not suited for rough weather or heavy-duty outdoor use.
Sigma fp
The Sigma fp is a rare breed: a full-frame, rangefinder-style mirrorless body that weighs a manageable 422g and measures 113x70x45mm. It’s minimalistic and surprisingly brace-like in your grip, but without handgrips or bulky clubs for thumbs. Not exactly a pocket carry, but it’s compact enough for a full-frame powerhouse.
Its magnesium-alloy chassis offers sturdiness and dust resistance, though it’s not waterproof or shockproof. It feels like a serious camera designed to survive professional use without the aggressive bumpers of certain sport-focused cameras.
Layout and Controls: Do You Feel at Home?
The best camera is the one that feels intuitive under your fingers. Especially when the decisive moment hits. Here’s what I noticed:
Casio EX-Z280
This point-and-shoot’s top plate is sparse, with the basics: shutter button, zoom toggle, and a modest mode dial. Nothing illuminated or especially tactile. It lacks customizable buttons, and with no viewfinder, it relies on the rear LCD entirely.
If you’re used to DSLR-type controls, this may feel limiting. For casual snaps, however, it’s straightforward and foolproof.
Sigma fp
The Sigma fp embraces simplicity with a handful of dials and a rich touchscreen interface on the back. While missing a built-in viewfinder (a known tradeoff), it features dedicated exposure controls - aperture, shutter speed, ISO - right on the top dials you expect from professional cameras.
It offers full manual control, customizable buttons, and a touchscreen that makes quick menu navigation a breeze. This camera expects you to know what you’re doing, and rewards that with quick access to settings.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality Insights
The technology under the glass often makes or breaks the image quality and versatility. Let’s pit their sensors and output capabilities head-to-head.
The Casio CCD 1/2.3" Sensor
The EX-Z280 packs a 12-megapixel CCD sensor sized at 1/2.3 inch (about 28mm²). This sensor size is standard for early compact cameras, balancing cost and size. Its 26-104mm (approximate 35mm equivalent) lens with F2.6-5.9 aperture can deliver decent casual snaps with usable zoom.
Brightness, sharpness, and color depth are modest by today’s standards - especially given the sensor’s limited dynamic range and lack of RAW support. In low light, noise can ramp up quickly past its ISO 3200 max sensitivity. The absence of image stabilization further challenges low-light handheld shots.
The Sigma fp: Full-Frame BSI-CMOS Marvel
The Sigma fp’s 25-megapixel full-frame sensor (858mm²) is large, behind a Leica L mount that supports a vast premium lens ecosystem. It produces high-resolution images with excellent detail, wide dynamic range, and notably higher native ISO sensitivity (up to 25,600 and boosted to 102,400).
Being a BSI-CMOS type, it excels in noise control and color depth, delivering cleaner images in challenging conditions. It shoots RAW, giving professionals the latitude they need in post-processing to craft perfect skin tones, refined shadows, and vibrant landscapes.
Display and Viewing Experience
Since neither camera has a built-in viewfinder, the rear LCD is critical.
EX-Z280’s Fixed 2.7-inch LCD
The Casio offers a 2.7-inch display with a low resolution of 115k dots. This screen isn’t particularly sharp or bright, which can be frustrating in sunny outdoor conditions. Without touchscreen support or articulation, angles for composing shots remain fixed.
It gets the job done for casual framing but isn’t ideal for precision manual focusing or image review.
Sigma fp’s Sharp 3.2-inch Touchscreen
Sigma steps up with a bright, crisp 3.2-inch LCD boasting 2.1 million dots and responsive touchscreen functionality. It enables touch to focus and sleek menu navigation - a blessing when working rapidly.
Not having a built-in EVF may irk some, but it rather presumes you’ll use an external monitor or live view compose on the high-quality screen the camera provides.
Autofocus and Focusing Flexibility
Can these cams nail sharp focus reliably across scenarios? Let’s compare their systems.
Casio’s Contrast-Detection AF
The EX-Z280 features a single AF mode with contrast-detection only, and no face or eye detection. It lacks multiple focus points or continuous tracking, so subjects must hold still and face the center for best results.
In practice, it can hunt in low light or with moving subjects - better suited for static or slow-moving scenes.
Sigma fp’s Hybrid Autofocus with Focus Points
The Sigma fp boasts 49 focus points with contrast-detection AF and face detection, as well as continuous autofocus and tracking. The touchscreen allows selecting AF points manually, speeding up precision work.
While it does not have phase detection, its performance is consistently snappy and reliable in daylight and reasonable indoors. It even offers focus peaking and magnification tools for manual focus fanatics.
Burst and Video Performance for Moving Subjects
Sports, wildlife, or street photographers care about frame rates and video specs - how do these two fare?
EX-Z280: Modest Shooting and Basic Video
The Casio lacks continuous shooting speeds, limiting burst capabilities. Video tops out at 720p 30fps in Motion JPEG format - a now dated codec that results in large files with limited editing flexibility.
Its limited zoom and fixed lens make it a casual point-and-shoot rather than an action photographer’s tool.
Sigma fp’s 12 fps Burst and 4K Video
In stark contrast, the Sigma fp offers 12 fps continuous shooting (more than double many comps) with full manual exposure modes accessible during bursts. Its 4K UHD video at 30p is clean, using H.264 codec with Linear PCM audio, and it supports external microphones and headphones for professional audio monitoring.
While it lacks in-body stabilization, it can output clean footage that videographers can shape extensively - a big plus for content creators.
Photography Disciplines: Which Camera Excels Where?
Here’s how these cameras perform in real-world photography genres.
Portraits: Skin Tones and Bokeh
-
Casio EX-Z280: The small sensor means shallow depth of field is limited, so background blur (bokeh) is mild at best. Skin tones tend to be slightly soft due to limited resolution and sensor quality. Face detection is absent, so manual focus is necessary, risking missed focus on eyes.
-
Sigma fp: Full-frame sensor combined with Leica L lenses offers excellent subject separation and creamy bokeh. Face detection and contrast autofocus lock eyes quickly - perfect for portrait photographers craving control and aesthetic depth.
Landscapes: Resolution and Dynamic Range
-
Casio: 12MP resolution is somewhat limiting for large prints or crops. Dynamic range is narrow, leading to clipped highlights or crushed shadows on scenes with contrast (think bright skies against dark foregrounds).
-
Sigma: 25MP sensor captures lush detail and an expansive tonal range, unveiling shadow and highlight gradients unseen on the Casio. Superior lens choices also allow edge-to-edge sharpness.
Wildlife and Sports: Speed and Tracking
-
Casio: Max shutter speed limited to 1/2000s, no burst mode or tracking AF. Zoom only 4x with modest reach. Not built for agile or distant subjects.
-
Sigma: 1/8000s shutter speed supports freezing fast motion. 12 fps burst and 49-point AF assist continuous tracking of wildlife or athletes. Paired with speedy telephoto L lenses, it’s a capable fast-action shooter.
Street Photography and Portability
-
Casio: Lightweight and disposable to the point of invisibility, great for candid street shots. Limited low-light ability and small zoom range limit versatility.
-
Sigma: Compact for a full-frame but less pocketable. Silent electronic shutter options (although not specified here) would help stealth shots. High ISO performance extends shooting into dim environments.
Macro Photography: Close-up Magic
-
Casio: Can focus down to 5cm, decent for basic close-ups. No stabilization means handheld macro shots risk shake.
-
Sigma: Macro capabilities depend on lens choice. Manual focus aids precision, but image stabilization absence means tripod use or steady hands.
Night and Astro Photography
-
Casio: Small sensor and limited ISO capacity mean noisy, low-detail night shots. Lacking bulb mode or long exposures.
-
Sigma: Supports long shutter speeds down to 30s, high boosted ISO up to 102,400 for astrophotography or night scenes. Full manual controls empower creative exposure.
Video Production
-
Casio: Simple 720p at 30fps, no microphone input, poor codec (Motion JPEG). Suitable only for casual home video.
-
Sigma: True 4K UHD recording, with professional codecs, microphone/headphone jacks for audio control, and timelapse recording. Although no in-body stabilization, it fits into a professional video rig.
Travel and Everyday Carry
-
Casio: Its true strength lies here - budget-friendly, extremely pocketable with sufficient zoom for snapshots. Battery life info is missing but tend to be modest.
-
Sigma: Compact full-frame excellence requires bigger lens systems and extra care, heavier but still manageable carry. Battery life is moderate; use with UHS-II cards aids fast storage.
Professional Use and Workflow
-
Casio: No RAW support, limiting professional workflow integration and image flexibility.
-
Sigma: RAW support with broad aspect ratios, professional controls, external flash compatibility, and USB/HDMI ports for tethered shooting or external monitors. Environmental sealing adds reliability in the field.
Connectivity and Storage Choices
The Casio EX-Z280 is on the basic side: no wifi, Bluetooth, GPS, or HDMI. It stores images on SD/SDHC cards and has a USB 2.0 port - fine for casual downloads but painfully slow by today’s standards.
The Sigma fp opts for a single SD card slot supporting UHS-II cards for speedy data handling. It lacks wireless features but offers USB-C and full-size HDMI ports, giving professional users flexible output options.
Price and Value: Who Should Buy Which?
At a glance, the cameras target wildly different buyers, reflected in their price tags:
-
Casio EX-Z280: Around $180 new (or less used), it’s an ultra-budget compact for beginners, holiday snappers, or those needing a simple backup camera. It won’t satisfy the demands of enthusiasts wanting control or top image quality, but it’s a value king in casual categories.
-
Sigma fp: Priced near $2050 (body only), it’s for photographers desiring a compact full-frame tool with manual control, high resolution, and professional video capabilities. Not a cheapskate camera by any means, but a highly specialized tool for users who need top-notch quality in a small package.
Visual Stories: Sample Images Comparison
To understand how these differences translate into photos, here’s a gallery showing side-by-side examples from both cameras:
Notice how the Sigma fp’s images exhibit richer detail, better color fidelity, and more dynamic range - especially in shadows and highlights - compared to the softer and noisier Casio captures. This difference is especially striking in low light and outdoor portraiture.
Breaking Down the Numbers: Overall and Genre-Specific Scores
To quantify what I’ve observed, I scored both cameras on various performance metrics based on hands-on test data and reading extensive reviews:
You’ll find the Sigma fp vastly outperforms the EX-Z280 in almost every category, from image quality to autofocus and video. The Casio remains acceptable only in casual travel and street genres where portability and simplicity trump technical factors.
The Final Verdict: Which Should You Bring Home?
Casio EX-Z280 - For the Budget-Conscious Casual Shooter
If you’re on a tight budget, want something super pocketable, and simply want to take quick snapshots for social media or family memories with minimal fuss, the EX-Z280 is a worthy companion. Think of it as a functional point-and-shoot that’s friendlier on your wallet and packs lightweight convenience.
Sigma fp - For the Advanced Enthusiast or Pro Who Wants Full-Frame in a Small Package
If image quality, manual control, and video quality matter - and you’re willing to invest in lenses and accessories - the Sigma fp is a rare gem. It excels in portraits, landscapes, video, and professional workflows, delivering versatility in a compact form that can slip into many bags or rigs.
Recommendations by Use Case
Discipline | Best Camera Recommendation |
---|---|
Portraits | Sigma fp (for sharpness and bokeh) |
Landscapes | Sigma fp (dynamic range and resolution) |
Wildlife | Sigma fp (burst speed and AF tracking) |
Sports | Sigma fp (high frame rate and shutter) |
Street | Casio EX-Z280 (discreet, lightweight) |
Macro | Sigma fp (with suitable lens) |
Night/Astro | Sigma fp (long exposure, high ISO) |
Video | Sigma fp (4K, audio ports, manual control) |
Travel | Casio EX-Z280 (size and simplicity) |
Professional Work | Sigma fp (file flexibility and reliability) |
Honest Reflections from My Experience
I love how cameras evolve: the EX-Z280 represents a snapshot from a simpler era - when point-and-shoots ruled before smartphones took over. It can still serve as a no-frills travel buddy. Meanwhile, the Sigma fp is a disruptive force, proving full-frame quality can be as compact and lightweight as a serious amateur might demand.
That said, the Sigma fp’s minimalism isn’t for everyone. Without a built-in EVF, stabilization, or weather-proofing, certain users will find it lacking out-of-the-box. But pair it with good glass and accessories, and it’s a silent tank in professional shoots.
Wrapping Up
Choosing between the Casio EX-Z280 and Sigma fp boils down to priorities:
- Want a cheap, compact, no-nonsense camera for casual use? Go Casio.
- Need a high-quality, manual-control capable full-frame shooter that doubles as pro-level video gear? Sigma fp wins.
No one camera fits all, but knowing their differences lets you invest truly according to your photographic goals and budget.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Sigma fp |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2019-07-11 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3.2" |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dots | 2,100 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 133g (0.29 lbs) | 422g (0.93 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $180 | $2,050 |