Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak Touch
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak Touch Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-Z29 versus Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and Touch (14MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and Touch (1/3") offer different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z29 was manufactured 22 months prior to the Touch making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-Z29 grades versus the Touch with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak Touch Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 and Kodak EasyShare Touch. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery and Kodak Touch Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Kodak Touch
| EX-Z29 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio EX-Z29
| Touch | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | March 2009 | Fresher by 22 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Kodak Touch
| EX-Z29 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z29 has outer measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Kodak Touch has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z29 versus Kodak Touch in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z29 versus the Touch.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z29 and Touch is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z29 and Touch.
To sum up, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z29 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Kodak Touch will provide you with more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z29 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z29 vs Kodak Touch Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Kodak EasyShare Touch | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Kodak EasyShare Touch |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-03-03 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-60 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $79 | $100 |