Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and WG-4 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z29 was released 5 years prior to the WG-4 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-Z29 matches up versus the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Ricoh WG-4
EX-Z29 | WG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-Z29
WG-4 | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | March 2009 | More modern by 60 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh WG-4
EX-Z29 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z29 offers outer dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z29 and the WG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z29 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The pic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z29 and WG-4.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z29 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-03-03 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 115k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-60 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $79 | $330 |