Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Launched August 2009
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2012
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z33 versus Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

The EX-Z33 was unveiled 3 years prior to the TG-320 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z33 scores versus the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus TG-320

 EX-Z33 TG-320 
Manual focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-Z33

 TG-320 EX-Z33 
ReleasedJanuary 2012August 2009More modern by 28 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus TG-320

 EX-Z33 TG-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 features outer measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z33 versus Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z33 vs the TG-320.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z33 and TG-320 is 97 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The picture below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and TG-320.

To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
26
you can focus manually
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
34
MP count decent (14MP)
supports face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Street photography details
Olympus TG-320 Street photography details
55
lighter than competition (106g)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition (155g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z33
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
16
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
41
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (150 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
56
lighter than competition (106g)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
67
lighter than competition (155 grams)
environment proofing
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery life (150 shots)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography info
27
you can focus manually
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5")
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery life (150 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Vlogging info
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging info
25
lighter than competition (106 grams)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone support
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus TG-320
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Olympus TG-320
General Information
Brand Name Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Olympus TG-320
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-08-31 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance 10cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 2.80 m 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 106 gr (0.23 pounds) 155 gr (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-82 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $120 $0