Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
19
Overall
30

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2009
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

Below is a detailed review of the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung ST95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The EX-Z33 was introduced 16 months earlier than the ST95 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-Z33 scores vs the ST95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung ST95

 EX-Z33 ST95 
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-Z33

 ST95 EX-Z33 
RevealedJanuary 2011August 2009More recent by 16 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung ST95

 EX-Z33 ST95 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z33 has exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung ST95 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z33 and the ST95.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z33 and ST95 is 97 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z33 and ST95.

To sum up, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Samsung ST95 to provide greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Portrait photography factors
Samsung ST95 Portrait photography factors
26
you can focus manually
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
low MP (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
29
resolution is good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Street photography info
Samsung ST95 Street photography info
55
lighter than competition (106g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
50
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
max ISO too low (0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Sports photography advice
Samsung ST95 Sports photography advice
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
27
resolution is good (16MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z33
Travel photography with Samsung ST95
56
lighter than competition (106g)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
low MP (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Landscape photography features
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography features
27
you can focus manually
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5")
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
37
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inches)
resolution is good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (0)
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Vlogging information
Samsung ST95 Vlogging information
25
lighter than competition (106 grams)
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic socket
27
fast maximum aperture (f)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung ST95
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Samsung ST95
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Samsung ST95
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-08-31 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 64 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) ()
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 2.80 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 106 gr (0.23 lb) -
Dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $120 $145