Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Succeeded the Sony A3000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z33 was unveiled 5 years prior to the a3500 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z33 grades versus the a3500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Sony Alpha a3500. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Sony a3500
| EX-Z33 | a3500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Casio EX-Z33
| a3500 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Sony a3500
| EX-Z33 | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Sony a3500 has proportions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z33 versus the a3500.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z33 and a3500 is 97 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The photograph below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z33 and a3500.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z33 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony a3500 will deliver more detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z33 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-08-31 | 2014-03-21 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106 gr (0.23 lbs) | 411 gr (0.91 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $120 | $398 |