Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR700
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched January 2013
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Casio EX-ZR700, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Casio. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and EX-ZR700 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z35 was revealed 3 years prior to the EX-ZR700 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the EX-ZR700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Casio Exilim EX-ZR700. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio EX-ZR700
EX-Z35 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Casio EX-Z35
EX-ZR700 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | February 2010 | More modern by 35 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio EX-ZR700
EX-Z35 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 provides outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR700 has proportions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 versus Casio EX-ZR700 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 and the EX-ZR700.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and EX-ZR700 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The image below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and EX-ZR700.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to provide you with more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2013-01-29 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | NP-130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $99 | $370 |