Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio TRYX
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio TRYX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Announced January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio TRYX Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio TRYX, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are designed by Casio. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the TRYX (12MP) is pretty close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 10 months earlier than the TRYX and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the TRYX with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio TRYX Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Casio Exilim TRYX. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Casio TRYX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Casio TRYX
| EX-Z35 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Casio EX-Z35
| TRYX | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 10 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio TRYX
| EX-Z35 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio TRYX Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Casio TRYX has specifications of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 and Casio TRYX in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the TRYX.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and TRYX is 96 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio TRYX Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and TRYX.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of files although you will need to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio TRYX Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z35 vs Casio TRYX Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim TRYX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Casio Exilim TRYX |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 21mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 461k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $99 | $689 |
