Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
![FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR front FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR/FujiFilm-Z700EXR-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
35 Features
22 Overall
29
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix Z707EXR
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-Z35 versus FujiFilm Z700EXR, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the Z700EXR (12MP) is relatively close but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Z700EXR (1/2") feature different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z35 was unveiled about the same time to the Z700EXR and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the Z700EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & FujiFilm Z700EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the FujiFilm Z700EXR
EX-Z35 | Z700EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z700EXR over the Casio EX-Z35
Z700EXR | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and FujiFilm Z700EXR
EX-Z35 | Z700EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2010 | ![]() | February 2010 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 has outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the FujiFilm Z700EXR has measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 versus FujiFilm Z700EXR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the Z700EXR.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and Z700EXR is 96 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The image here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and Z700EXR.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 features the smaller sensor which should make obtaining bokeh harder.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-FujiFilm-FinePix-Z700EXR-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm Z700EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR |
Also called | - | FinePix Z707EXR |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.9-4.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 9cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | NP-45A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $99 | $250 |