Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Released January 2015
- Old Model is Fujifilm XQ1
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) is pretty close but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") posses different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 5 years before the Fujifilm XQ2 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z35 matches up vs the Fujifilm XQ2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Fujifilm XQ2. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Fujifilm XQ2
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Casio EX-Z35
| Fujifilm XQ2 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 59 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Fujifilm XQ2
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 features exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XQ2 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the Fujifilm XQ2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm XQ2 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The image underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm XQ2.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same MP albeit different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 comes with the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh tougher. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2015-01-14 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR Processor II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | NP-48 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $99 | $299 |
