Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") possess different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z35 was introduced 14 months after the M320 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-Z35 matches up vs the M320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Kodak M320
| EX-Z35 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 14 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z35
| M320 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Kodak M320
| EX-Z35 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z35 against the M320.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and M320.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-Z35 will offer you greater detail using its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer EX-Z35 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z35 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $99 | $39 |
