Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB1100F
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Revealed January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung WB1100F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WB1100F (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was released 4 years earlier than the WB1100F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the WB1100F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Samsung WB1100F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB1100F
| EX-Z35 | WB1100F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Casio EX-Z35
| WB1100F | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 47 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB1100F
| EX-Z35 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 provides external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") and a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung WB1100F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z35 and the WB1100F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and WB1100F is 96 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WB1100F.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB1100F to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB1100F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 512 gr (1.13 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $99 | $250 |