Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Revealed February 2010
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Launched January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB350F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-Z35 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WB350F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the WB350F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB350F

 EX-Z35 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-Z35

 WB350F EX-Z35 
LaunchedJanuary 2014February 2010More modern by 47 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB350F

 EX-Z35 WB350F 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the WB350F.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and WB350F.

To sum up, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB350F to render extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Portrait photography camera
27
focusing manually
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
40
manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography information
Samsung WB350F Street photography information
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (276g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography features
Samsung WB350F Sports photography features
17
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
50
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB350F Travel photography factors
52
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
69
lighter than competitors (276g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography info
28
focusing manually
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
50
manual focus
really wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging features
Samsung WB350F Vlogging features
22
wide angle not good (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic jack
34
really wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (276g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB350F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Samsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Samsung WB350F
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-02-21 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124 grams (0.27 pounds) 276 grams (0.61 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $99 $260