Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB350F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z35 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WB350F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the WB350F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB350F
EX-Z35 | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-Z35
WB350F | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | February 2010 | More modern by 47 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB350F
EX-Z35 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the WB350F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing specifications. The image below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and WB350F.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB350F to render extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB350F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $99 | $260 |