Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB35F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-Z35 was released 4 years before the WB35F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB35F
EX-Z35 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-Z35
WB35F | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 47 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB35F
EX-Z35 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the WB35F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and WB35F.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB35F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $99 | $130 |