Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2010
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB35F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The EX-Z35 was released 4 years before the WB35F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB35F

 EX-Z35 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-Z35

 WB35F EX-Z35 
IntroducedJanuary 2014February 2010More recent by 47 months
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB35F

 EX-Z35 WB35F 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the WB35F.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and WB35F.

To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
27
focusing manually
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
37
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z35
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Sports photography camera
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z35
Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
52
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low resolution (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
70
lighter than competition (194 grams)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (288mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography factors
28
focusing manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5")
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
43
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging details
Samsung WB35F Vlogging details
22
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
31
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB35F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Samsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Samsung WB35F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-02-21 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124g (0.27 lbs) 194g (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail price $99 $130