Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch Overview
Here, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the Touch (14MP) is very well matched but the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and Touch (1/3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z400 was manufactured 24 months before the Touch making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-Z400 matches up against the Touch in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Kodak EasyShare Touch. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Kodak Touch Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Kodak Touch
| EX-Z400 | Touch |
|---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio EX-Z400
| Touch | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Kodak Touch
| EX-Z400 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z400 offers outside measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak Touch has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z400 and the Touch.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z400 and Touch is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and Touch.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z400 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Kodak Touch will resolve greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak Touch Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Kodak EasyShare Touch | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Kodak EasyShare Touch |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1600s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $100 |