Casio EX-Z450 vs Nikon P7800
96 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30


82 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Casio EX-Z450 vs Nikon P7800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 128g - 81 x 56 x 21mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 399g - 119 x 78 x 50mm
- Revealed November 2013

Casio EX-Z450 vs Nikon Coolpix P7800: A Thorough Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing your next camera can feel like walking into a candy store with a wallet that’s mysteriously shrinking. The Casio EX-Z450 and Nikon Coolpix P7800, though both pocket-sized compacts, are worlds apart in terms of performance, features, and price (the EX-Z450 at around $230 vs P7800 at about $550). I’ve spent enough hours with their sensors, buttons, and in-field tests to give you a no-fluff side-by-side comparison covering everything from portrait finesse to wildlife agility.
Buckle up! We’re diving into these two compacts - from pixel-peeping sensor tech to practical usability in varied photography situations.
Pocket Rockets at a Glance: Physical Size and Handling
When it comes to carry-everywhere, size and build make a huge difference. The Casio EX-Z450 is delightfully slim and lightweight at 81 x 56 x 21 mm and just 128 grams. In contrast, the Nikon P7800 is bulkier, measuring 119 x 78 x 50 mm and weighing nearly 400 grams. This isn’t just a specs difference - grab both in hand, and you’ll feel the Nikkor-powered heft giving a solid grip versus Casio's sleek but fragile shell.
Casio’s EX-Z450 is straightforward: compact, pocket-friendly with minimalistic controls - perfect for the casual shooter or travel light lovers. However, the flip side is a tiny 3-inch screen with low 230k-dot resolution and no viewfinder - no real joy if you like framing via eye-level.
The Nikon P7800 comes stocked with thoughtful ergonomics: clubs for thumbs with dials and buttons laid out like a pro camera, plus a fully articulated 3-inch touchscreen with crisp 921k resolution. On top, the Nikon’s top dials give you direct access to shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation, a real boon once you move past point-and-shoot mindset.
In daylight, the P7800’s whisper-quiet electronic viewfinder (also 921k-dot) is a blessing. The Casio doesn’t even try, which may force you into awkward LCD shooting under bright sun.
Bottom line: If pocketability is your highest priority, the Casio’s the champ. For handling, control, and usability, the Nikon P7800 stands head and shoulders above.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Pixels Matter
Despite both cameras featuring a 12MP sensor, size and design define image quality. The EX-Z450 sports a 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²), a typical sensor size for its class at launch in 2009. In contrast, Nikon employs a larger 1/1.7” BSI-CMOS sensor sized at 7.44 x 5.58 mm (41.52 mm²), which gives it a meaningful edge in image quality - especially in low light and dynamic range.
CCD sensors like the Casio’s shine in daylight with decent color and noise control at base ISO. However, they tend to struggle as ISO climbs, showing noise and lacking the dynamic punch coveted by enthusiasts.
Nikon’s later-generation back-illuminated CMOS sensor provides higher color depth (21.2-bit vs. untested for Casio), better dynamic range (11.7 EV vs untested), and superior low-light ISO performance - all proven through DXO Mark benchmarks (P7800 scores a respectable 54 overall).
In real-world terms, this means shots from the P7800 have cleaner shadows, retain highlights on bright days (think clouds and snow), and handle indoor or night images with less grain. Casio’s CCD sensor will require strong daylight conditions to shine, and even then, contrast and color fidelity don’t match the Nikon’s richer files.
User Interface and Screen: Your Connection with the Shot
Let’s talk screen and interface because, yes, that’s how you “see” your shot without guessing or ruining composition.
The Casio EX-Z450 provides a fixed 3-inch LCD with 230k-dot resolution. That’s low by today’s standards and even mid-2000s compact cameras have surpassed that. You’ll struggle with fine focus confirmation or judging exposure, especially outdoors.
Conversely, Nikon equips the P7800 with a fully articulated 3-inch 921k-dot screen that's both crisp and versatile for high-angle shooting - huge for macro, street, or travel shots. Plus, the bigger resolution makes playback and menu navigation wonderfully clear.
To add icing to the cake, the P7800’s EVF matches screen clarity and provides 100% coverage - a rarity on small compacts that keeps you connected when bright sun kills LCD visibility.
Performance in Portrait Photography: Capturing Skin and Soul
Portraiture demands accurate skin tones, refined bokeh to isolate the subject, and smart focusing - especially on eyes.
The Casio EX-Z450’s slow f/2.6 to f/5.8 fixed lens (28-112mm equivalent) limits shallow depth-of-field effects, especially at telephoto. Add to that its contrast-detection autofocus with no face or eye detection and you’re left relying on center-weighted AF and precise timing.
The Nikon P7800 lifts the bar remarkably: a faster f/2.0 to f/4.0 zoom (28-200mm equivalent) lens lets you create separation with lovely creamy bokeh, while 99-point AF includes face detection and continuous tracking, dramatically improving focus on eyes during candid portraits.
In controlled studio conditions or natural light, Nikon’s RAW support is a big winner, capturing broad tonal information and letting you fine-tune skin tones painlessly during post-processing. Casio’s JPEG-only limits your editing latitude, a no-go for pro-level portrait editing.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution Showdown
You’re adventuring on a misty mountain or at dawn on the coast - landscape demands tack-sharp images, a wide dynamic range, and reliability under the elements.
The Nikon’s larger sensor and better dynamic range give it a distinct edge in pulling details from shadows and highlights without nasty clipping. Casio’s sensor, while 12MP as well, lacks the bit depth and dynamic flexibility, frequently yielding flatter files with harsher highlight roll-off.
At maximum resolution, both produce 4000x3000 pixel images - fine for print sizes up to A3 - but the Nikon’s sensor technology combined with optical image stabilization helps keep handheld long exposures sharp. The Casio relies on steadier hands or tripods due to no image stabilization.
Neither camera offers any real weather sealing, so harsh environments demand extra protective care.
Wildlife Photography: Nailing Autofocus Speed and Burst Rates
Here’s where the rubber meets the road for fast-moving critters: autofocus tracking and burst shooting.
Casio serves up a single AF point contrast detection system only, with no continuous AF tracking. That, paired with a relatively slow maximum shutter speed of 1/1000 sec and a fast 10fps burst mode, makes timing and focus relying heavily on anticipation.
Nikon’s P7800 employs a more advanced 99-point system with continuous AF and subject tracking, ideal for unpredictable wildlife. Although its burst speed is a tad slower at 8fps, the focus accuracy and reliability on moving animals far outpace the Casio.
Plus, the longer 28-200mm zoom range on Nikon (7.1x zoom) means more reach - critical when you can’t physically get closer to shy wildlife.
Sports Photography: Frame Rate and Tracking Precision
Much like wildlife, sports photography is a test of quick reflexes and autofocus muscle.
The EX-Z450’s high 10fps burst sounds impressive but lacks continuous AF, so you’ll shoot many soft or missed focus frames when tracking fast subjects.
The P7800’s 8fps burst paired with AF tracking and face detection strikes a practical middle ground here. Its shutter speeds max out at 1/4000 sec for sharp freezing of action, versus Casio’s 1/1000 sec max shutter speed - a notable limitation in bright daylight action shots.
Both cameras can struggle in dim conditions due to small sensors, but Nikon’s superior low-light ISO performance means less noise at faster speeds.
The Street Photographer’s Companion: Discretion, Portability, and Low Light
For street shooters, being unnoticed and ready is key.
Casio’s compactness and lightness play well for stealthy candid shooting. Its quiet operation and simple controls mean less fumbling.
However, its slow lens aperture and absence of EVF can slow your reaction in tricky lighting or in crowded scenes. The small, low-res screen can frustrate attempts at composition in harsh lighting.
Nikon’s P7800 is larger and heavier, less pocket-friendly, but the articulated screen allows discreet shooting from awkward angles, and the EVF means quick framing without lifting the camera too far from your face.
Its faster aperture and better ISO capabilities also perform better in low light cityscapes or dusk scenes.
Diving into Macro and Close-Up Fun
Macro enthusiasts need close focusing, sharp optics, and steady handling.
Casio cites a 10cm minimum focusing distance - not exceptional, but serviceable for casual macro shots. Without image stabilization, handheld macro is tricky and prone to blur.
Nikon P7800’s 5cm macro focusing brings you a lot closer to your subject for detailed shots. The combination of a faster lens and optical image stabilization is a gamechanger, enabling crisp shots even handheld at close range.
Night and Astro Performance: Low-Light Reliability and Long Exposure
If you enjoy astro or night photography, sensor noise control, long exposures, and ISO latitude matter.
Casio’s CCD sensor maxes out at ISO 1600 (no boosted ISO), often with notable noise above ISO 400 in my experience. Plus, its maximum shutter speed is 1/1000 sec - not helpful for long exposures where you want seconds or minutes.
Nikon provides longer shutter speeds (up to 60 sec), ISO up to 6400 with boosts, and better noise management due to BSI CMOS technology. You’ll get cleaner, more usable images of stars or cityscapes at night.
However, neither offers in-body stabilization refined enough for multi-second handheld low-light shots - so mildly tripod-dependent for serious night work.
Video Capabilities: Quality and Features for Moving Images
For vloggers and hybrid shooters, video specs are crucial.
Casio EX-Z450 offers HD video at 1280x720p, capped at 24 fps, recorded with Motion JPEG. No microphone port limits sound quality, and image stabilization is absent.
Meanwhile, Nikon’s more advanced tech delivers Full HD 1080p at 24/30 fps, slow-motion capabilities (e.g., 720p60, 480p120), and H.264 encoding for better compression and quality. Plus, a microphone input lets you connect external mics for improved sound.
In practical use, Nikon’s videos are sharper, less noisy, and more flexible for creative uses.
Travel and Everyday Use: Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
Casio keeps it basic: no weather sealing, no external flash, and limited battery info (uses NP-40 battery). With USB 2.0 connectivity and Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless transfers, the EX-Z450 covers essential bases but little more. Storage is standard SD/SDHC cards plus small internal memory.
The P7800 packs a bigger battery (EN-EL14) rated for about 350 shots, sturdy battery life for travel days, and SD/SDHC/SDXC support for high-capacity cards - important for RAW and extended video.
Connectivity is optional via accessories, lacks Bluetooth or NFC, but includes HDMI output for direct playback on displays.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Fixed and Focused
Both cameras have fixed lenses: no changing glass here.
Casio’s 28-112mm (4x zoom) lens with f/2.6-5.8 aperture is fine for casual use but limits creativity with shallow depth and reach.
Nikon’s broader 28-200mm (7.1x zoom) with brighter f/2.0-4.0 aperture is versatile - great for everything from wide landscapes to portraits and distant wildlife.
This variety gives the P7800 an edge for enthusiasts wanting flexibility without lugging interchangeable lenses.
Durability and Build Quality: How Tough Are These?
Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedized builds geared for harsh environments. Casio’s slim case is more prone to damage from drops or knocks.
Nikon’s P7800, while larger and heavier, feels sturdier with a metal chassis and rubberized grips adding confidence for frequent outdoor use.
Value Analysis: Price vs. Performance
You could buy two Casio EX-Z450s for the price of one Nikon P7800. The EX-Z450 is undeniably cheap and easy, great for beginners or backup shooters craving compact size and simple operation.
But in weight-to-performance, features, and image/video quality, the Nikon P7800 is miles ahead. It justifies its premium by delivering pro-grade controls, better optics, and improved files suitable for serious enthusiasts and hobbyists seeking quality without going full DSLR or mirrorless.
Putting It All Together: How Do They Stack Up Overall?
Looking across the board, Nikon P7800 outclasses the Casio EX-Z450 in virtually every critical area: sensor tech, autofocus prowess, control layout, optics, video, and versatile shooting modes.
Casio’s strengths boil down to pocketability, ultra-affordability, and ease of use for the absolute casual snapshooter.
For enthusiasts who care about image quality, creative control, and performance, the Nikon is worth the investment despite its bulk and higher price.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
Choose the Casio EX-Z450 if:
- You want a simple, budget-friendly compact for casual photography.
- Portability and light weight trump image quality or features.
- You need easy point-and-shoot operation without fuss or menus.
- You’re okay with limited low-light, fixed lens performance, and no RAW files.
Choose the Nikon Coolpix P7800 if:
- You’re an enthusiast seeking DSLR-level control in a compact form.
- You want superior image quality for portraits, landscapes, or wildlife.
- Video capabilities and articulated screen matter.
- You plan to shoot in diverse conditions requiring flexible zoom and shutter/aperture priority modes.
- RAW support and better low-light imaging are important for extensive editing.
Parting Shots From My Testing Experience
I took both cameras on multiple photo walks: the Casio was a nimble companion for quick snaps but quickly showed its limits under tricky lighting and in demanding focus scenarios. The Nikon, while bigger and weightier, felt like a trusted workhorse - responsive, capable, and rewarding to tweak with.
If you’re a budget-conscious beginner looking for a fuss-free starter or tiny travel buddy, Casio serves its role. But for anyone serious about image quality and creative flexibility, the Nikon P7800 remains one of the best “small sensor compact” cameras of its era and a fine bargain for enthusiasts on a budget who dislike carrying full-size DSLRs or mirrorless rigs.
If you have questions or want gear recommendations tailored to your niche and budget, I’m happy to weigh in - because choosing the right camera is not just specs on paper, it’s what feels right in your hands and sparks your photographic passion.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-Z450 vs Nikon P7800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Nikon Coolpix P7800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z450 | Nikon Coolpix P7800 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-18 | 2013-11-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.8 | f/2.0-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 921k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (25p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high-speed: 1920 x 1080 (15 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) | 399 gr (0.88 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 81 x 56 x 21mm (3.2" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 119 x 78 x 50mm (4.7" x 3.1" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 200 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | EN-EL14 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $229 | $550 |