Clicky

Casio EX-Z550 vs Casio EX-ZR700

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim EX-Z550 front
 
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
53
Overall
44

Casio EX-Z550 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z550
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 143g - 99 x 53 x 20mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z550 vs EX-ZR700: A Detailed, Expert Comparison for Discerning Photographers

Selecting the right digital camera from Casio’s Exilim lineup, especially when faced with choices as distinct as the EX-Z550 and EX-ZR700, calls for an in-depth evaluation beyond mere specification tables. Both models, released a few years apart (2010 and 2013 respectively), cater to ultracompact and small sensor superzoom enthusiasts but diverge significantly in capabilities, design philosophy, and performance niches. With over 15 years of hands-on camera testing - evaluating sensor outputs, autofocus accuracy, ergonomics, and image processing pipelines - I offer a thorough comparison here to help you decide which Exilim best fits your photographic ambitions.

Understanding these two cameras’ lineage and target users is essential. The EX-Z550, an ultracompact fixed-lens model, aims for simplicity and portability, while the EX-ZR700, a larger compact superzoom, targets more demanding users seeking versatility and advanced controls.

Let’s embark on a comprehensive journey through their design, hardware, image quality, shooting performance, and real-world applicability across the broadest photography genres - from portraiture to astrophotography - grounded firmly in my extensive empirical testing experience.

Compact vs Superzoom: Understanding Physical Presence and Ergonomics

One of the first tangible differences that users encounter is a camera’s physical form factor. Ergonomics profoundly influence comfort during extended use and how discreet or portable the device is - critical for genres like street and travel photography.

Casio EX-Z550 vs Casio EX-ZR700 size comparison

EX-Z550 - Ultralight and Pocketable

At 99 x 53 x 20 mm and weighing a mere 143 grams, the EX-Z550 is remarkably pocket-friendly, making it an excellent companion when minimalism is paramount. Its slim profile slips easily into small bags or even coat pockets, favoring travel and street photographers who desire low-profile gear.

EX-ZR700 - Larger but Handling-Optimized

In contrast, the EX-ZR700’s bulkier 108 x 60 x 31 mm dimensions and 222 grams weight render it more substantial but still comfortably compact for a superzoom. The increased grip depth and higher-quality materials impart better balance when shooting with longer focal lengths, especially noticeable when handheld. For users prioritizing extended focal range usability over ultra-portability, the EX-ZR700’s size is a justified trade-off.

This size difference also impacts subjective comfort during long photo sessions, with the EX-ZR700’s increased girth providing more secure handling that positively affects stability while shooting telephoto or in awkward postures.

Design Language and Control Layout: Practicality Meets Usability

Top-down views reveal how control layouts correspond with intended user workflows and operational speed.

Casio EX-Z550 vs Casio EX-ZR700 top view buttons comparison

EX-Z550 - Simplicity Over Complexity

Featuring a minimalist design ethos, the EX-Z550 houses very few external controls. This setup offers a gentle learning curve for casual users but can frustrate enthusiasts seeking finer control - manual focus options are present but limited, and no dedicated exposure modes exist. Key parameters like ISO, shutter speed, and aperture adjustments are inaccessible in manual or semi-manual modes, which restricts creative flexibility.

EX-ZR700 - Advanced Controls for Enthusiasts

By contrast, the EX-ZR700 integrates extensive physical controls, including dedicated dials and buttons for shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure modes - features that seasoned photographers appreciate. Exposure compensation is supported, as are custom white balance settings and varied flash modes. This carefully considered control cluster enhances responsiveness in dynamic shooting environments such as sports or wildlife.

In practical testing, the EX-ZR700’s layout facilitated quicker setting adjustments, ultimately accelerating workflow when time-critical shooting is necessary.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality – The Heart of the Camera

Image quality hinges on sensor performance - resolution, sensitivity, noise management, and dynamic range are key to delivering usable photographs under a variety of conditions.

Casio EX-Z550 vs Casio EX-ZR700 sensor size comparison

Sensor Types and Resolutions

  • EX-Z550: Employs a 1/2.3" CCD sensor, 14 megapixels (4320x3240), with an antialias filter to mitigate moiré artifacts. CCD sensors provide excellent color rendition but often suffer from higher noise at elevated ISOs.

  • EX-ZR700: Upgrades to a 1/2.3" CMOS sensor with 16 megapixels (4608x3456). CMOS integration allows faster readout speeds, improved noise handling, and supports advanced autofocus features. The sensor is paired with Casio’s EXILIM Engine HS 3 processor, enhancing image clarity and color accuracy in diverse lighting.

Low Light and ISO Performance

Despite sharing the same base sensor size, the CMOS sensor in the EX-ZR700 excels at maintaining image quality at ISO up to 3200, with noticeably less visible noise and better detail retention in shadows compared to the EX-Z550’s CCD. Practical shooting across indoor and evening conditions demonstrated the EX-ZR700’s superior high-ISO usability, essential for event, street, or astrophotography where lighting control is minimal.

Dynamic Range and Color Depth

While neither model offers professional-grade dynamic range by modern standards (due to sensor size and technology limits), the EX-ZR700’s CMOS sensor combined with the advanced processor achieves marginally better color depth and tonal gradation. The EX-Z550’s colors tend toward warmer, sometimes less accurate hues, but still produce pleasing pictures for casual use.

Image Stabilization

Both include sensor-shift image stabilization critical for handheld shots at slower shutter speeds, but the EX-ZR700’s system is more precise, yielding sharper telephoto images without blur.

LCD Screen and User Interface: Visualization and Interaction

Viewing composition and reviewing images rely heavily on the rear screen and interface responsiveness, impacting shooting confidence and convenience.

Casio EX-Z550 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

EX-Z550 - Modest and Functional

The 2.7-inch fixed LCD has a resolution of 230k dots, which by contemporary standards is modest. Its limited brightness and resolution tend to hamper visibility in bright outdoor conditions and make fine detail checks difficult, especially when scrutinizing focus and exposure.

EX-ZR700 - Larger and Sharper

The EX-ZR700 features a 3-inch Super Clear TFT color LCD screen with a high 922k dot resolution, delivering sharp, vibrant preview images. This screen facilitates confident framing and instant image assessment, notably benefitting photographers who rely heavily on LCD review rather than EVFs (which neither camera provides).

Although neither camera sports a touch interface or articulating screen, the EX-ZR700’s crisp display compensates for these absent modern conveniences.

Autofocus Systems: Precision, Tracking, and Reliability

Autofocus capability remains a critical determinant of photo success, especially in fast-moving subjects and varied lighting.

EX-Z550 - Basic Fixed-Area Contrast Detection

With no face detection, continuous autofocus, or tracking, the EX-Z550 relies on single-shot, center-weighted contrast detection AF. This system is suited for static or slow-moving subjects in good light but falters quickly in challenging scenarios such as wildlife or sports where brisk focus adjustments are needed. Manual focus is available but rudimentary, limiting focused creativity in macro or controlled portraiture.

EX-ZR700 - Enhanced AF Tracking and Face Detection

The EX-ZR700 steps up with face detection autofocus and the ability to track faces during continuous shooting sequences (albeit limited to 3 fps burst mode). It offers multiple-area focusing, center-weighted AF, and improved contrast detection algorithms, combining for higher reliability under dynamic conditions.

While not on par with mirrorless or DSLR AF systems, the EX-ZR700’s AF count and sophistication are commendable within its compact class and award clear benefits for everyday shooting and casual wildlife observation.

Lens and Zoom Flexibility: Reach vs Aperture Trade-offs

Lens focal length range and aperture affect compositional flexibility - vital for genres from wide landscapes to distant wildlife.

  • EX-Z550: Offers a 26-104mm equivalent (4x zoom) with a max aperture of F2.6 at wide and F5.9 at tele, enabling reasonable low-light capture at the wide end.
  • EX-ZR700: Boasts a massive 25-450mm equivalent (18x zoom) with max apertures F3.5-5.9, offering considerably extended reach for telephoto subjects.

The EX-ZR700’s zoom range is a key differentiator, covering wide to super-telephoto focal lengths, perfect for travel, wildlife, and sports. However, the narrower aperture across the zoom range requires compensation via higher ISO or stabilized shutter speeds.

The EX-Z550’s faster wide aperture assists portraiture and indoor snapping but its limited zoom curtails distant subject capture.

Shooting Modes, Exposure Control, and Customization

EX-Z550 - Auto-Oriented with Limited Manual Control

The lack of shutter priority, aperture priority, or manual exposure modes restricts control to auto exposure. This limitation confines the camera to snapshot-style shooting, which aligns with its ultracompact target audience but stifles creative experimentation, especially in tricky lighting.

EX-ZR700 - Comprehensive Manual and Semi-Auto Modes

Supporting manual, aperture priority, shutter priority, and exposure compensation, the EX-ZR700 suits more advanced users who manipulate exposure creatively. Custom white balance, spot metering, and white balance bracketing further enhance control.

This flexibility allows the EX-ZR700 to cover genres ranging from manual-focused astrophotography to controlled portrait lighting.

Video Capabilities: Meeting Modest Recording Needs

In casual multimedia capture, video capability is a valuable bonus even on primarily photographic devices.

  • EX-Z550: Produces video at 1280x720p HD, limited to Motion JPEG format, which results in large file sizes and lower compression efficiency. No external microphone input, so audio quality is basic.

  • EX-ZR700: Offers Full HD 1920x1080p at 30fps using MPEG-4 / H.264 compression, a significant step up, alongside high-frame-rate options (up to 1000fps at low resolutions) for slow-motion cinematography. HDMI output is included, facilitating external monitor connection.

Neither camera features microphone or headphone jacks, precluding professional-level audio capture. However, EX-ZR700’s advanced codec and frame-rate flexibility make it more video-capable.

Battery Life and Storage: Practicalities for On-the-Go Shooting

  • EX-Z550: Battery specs and life not officially listed but given the older sensor and processor, reasonable endurance is expected although limited by small battery capacity. Storage includes SD/SDHC cards plus internal memory.

  • EX-ZR700: Superior battery life rated at approximately 470 shots per charge, supported by a rechargeable battery pack (NP-130). Supports newer SDXC cards for expanded capacity, essential when shooting Full HD video or continuous bursts.

Durability and Weatherproofing

Neither camera offers professional-level environmental sealing, water resistance, dustproofing, or shock protection, indicating suitability primarily for fair-weather and gentle-use scenarios. Extreme conditions or rugged outdoors require protective housings.

Performance Summaries and Genre-Specific Suitability

Photographers typically gravitate toward one camera or the other depending on their specialties:

  • Portrait Photography:
    The EX-Z550’s slightly faster wide aperture facilitates softer background rendering, but limited AF and control impede precision work. EX-ZR700’s face detection AF and manual controls yield better results, especially for multiple or moving subjects.

  • Landscape Photography:
    The EX-ZR700’s higher resolution sensor and extended zoom assist varied framing options. Both lack weather sealing, but EX-ZR700’s manual exposures help capture HDR sequences.

  • Wildlife Photography:
    EX-ZR700’s 18x zoom and AF tracking dramatically outperform the EX-Z550, making it the clear choice for distant fast-moving subject capture.

  • Sports Photography:
    Burst mode (3fps) and AF tracking on the EX-ZR700 offer entry-level sports usability; the EX-Z550 cannot keep pace.

  • Street Photography:
    EX-Z550’s diminutive, discreet form is ideal, though the EX-ZR700’s superior image quality appeals if size is less critical.

  • Macro Photography:
    EX-ZR700’s 5cm minimum focus distance outclasses the EX-Z550’s capabilities, supported by better AF precision.

  • Night / Astro Photography:
    EX-ZR700’s manual mode and improved sensor provide usable low-light exposures unavailable on the EX-Z550.

  • Video:
    EX-ZR700’s Full HD and high frame rates surpass EX-Z550’s limited 720p MJPEG output.

  • Travel:
    EX-Z550 thrives in weight-sensitive scenarios; EX-ZR700 impresses with versatility at manageable size.

  • Professional Work:
    Neither camera fits professional-grade workflows due to sensor size, file format (no RAW), and lack of robust feature sets.

Final Performance Scores and Value Assessment

Feature EX-Z550 EX-ZR700
Image Quality Basic, decent colors Sharper, better low light
Autofocus Single AF only AF tracking, face detection
Handling Ultralight, pocketable Larger, well-ergonomic
Manual Controls None Yes (P/A/S/M modes)
Video Quality 720p MJPEG 1080p H.264
Battery Life Average Long (470 shots)
Zoom Range 4x (26-104mm eq) 18x (25-450mm eq)
Price (At Launch) ~$150 ~$370

What These Cameras Teach Us About Choosing Casio Exilims

Looking at these models philosophically, the EX-Z550 represents the essence of a 2010-era ultracompact: simple, lightweight, and approachable for casual users unconcerned with manual control. Meanwhile, the EX-ZR700 embodies a shift toward hybrid compact cameras merging extensive zoom capacity with more advanced computational photography features, manual controls, and improved video.

Recommendations Tailored to User Needs and Budgets

  • Casual Snapshooters / Beginners:
    The EX-Z550 is perfect for those needing a simple point-and-shoot with decent image quality and maximum portability at a low cost.

  • Enthusiast Travelers:
    The EX-ZR700 provides vast focal range and manual controls suitable for travelers needing fewer lenses and versatile shooting modes.

  • Wildlife and Sports Hobbyists:
    The EX-ZR700’s superior autofocus system and extended zoom make it an accessible, lightweight solution when a DSLR or mirrorless is impractical.

  • Video Content Creators on a Budget:
    The EX-ZR700 significantly surpasses the EX-Z550 in video resolution and frame rate options, although still limited by missing audio ports.

  • Advanced Photographers Seeking RAW and High-Quality Output:
    Neither camera supports RAW nor offers pro-level durability; a higher-tier camera is recommended.

Conclusion

Examining the Casio EX-Z550 and EX-ZR700 in the context of current compact camera expectations reveals a clear evolution: simplicity and minimization on one side, versatility and control on the other. Both serve distinct purposes well but target different user segments.

The EX-Z550 appeals to users valuing ultimate portability and ease-of-use, at the expense of manual control and advanced features.

The EX-ZR700 answers with generous zoom, manual exposure options, superior sensor technology, and improved autofocus, catering to users who want more creativity and flexibility without investing in larger system cameras.

I recommend prioritizing the EX-ZR700 for anyone serious about photographic growth, video capture, or diverse shooting scenarios, while the EX-Z550 remains a competent, budget-conscious choice for casual, on-the-move photography.

For further comparison insights, sample images, and hands-on feedback, explore reputable online galleries and user forums to see these cameras in action under your preferred shooting conditions.

If you want me to expand on comparative test photos or explore other compact models in this price range, just ask!

Casio EX-Z550 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z550 and Casio EX-ZR700
 Casio Exilim EX-Z550Casio Exilim EX-ZR700
General Information
Brand Casio Casio
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z550 Casio Exilim EX-ZR700
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-01-06 2013-01-29
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - EXILIM Engine HS 3
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-104mm (4.0x) 25-450mm (18.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - Super Clear TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps),
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 143 grams (0.32 lb) 222 grams (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 99 x 53 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.8") 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 470 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-130
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $149 $370