Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm JZ200
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Overview
Let's look closer at the Casio EX-Z800 versus Fujifilm JZ200, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z800 was manufactured 17 months earlier than the Fujifilm JZ200 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm JZ200 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z800 scores vs the Fujifilm JZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Fujifilm FinePix JZ200. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| EX-Z800 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Casio EX-Z800
| Fujifilm JZ200 | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 17 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Fujifilm JZ200
| EX-Z800 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 enjoys physical measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm JZ200 has specifications of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z800 versus Fujifilm JZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z800 compared to the Fujifilm JZ200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm JZ200 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specifications. The photograph here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z800 and Fujifilm JZ200.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Fujifilm JZ200 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm JZ200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-08-03 | 2012-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 135 grams (0.30 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $0 |