Casio EX-Z800 vs Fujifilm XP120

Comparing the Casio EX-Z800 and Fujifilm XP120: Which Ultracompact Camera Delivers Real Value in 2024?

In a world increasingly dominated by smartphones and mirrorless cameras, ultracompact point-and-shoot cameras like the Casio EX-Z800 and Fujifilm XP120 still hold appeal - especially for those who want simplicity, pocketability, or durable, ready-to-go gear. Having personally tested hundreds of ultracompacts over the years, I’m always fascinated by how these relatively small shooters balance image quality, features, and handling - often targeting very different users despite similar form factors.

Today, I’m putting the Casio EX-Z800 (2010) and the Fujifilm XP120 (2017) side by side. These two represent distinct eras and philosophies in ultracompact camera design. The Casio may be the older, simpler model, but does it still hold up in 2024? And is the Fujifilm XP120 - with its rugged, waterproof build and improved specs - worth the extra investment?

I’ll break down everything from sensor performance and autofocus to ergonomics, video capabilities, and suitability across major photography disciplines, based on hands-on evaluations and technical analysis. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which camera fits your needs best - whether you’re a casual snapshooter or a specialist looking for a reliable backup.

How Do These Cameras Feel in the Hand? Size and Ergonomics Matter

Let’s start with the physical experience of using these cameras. Size, weight, and button layout influence comfort and quick operation, which is crucial if you’re shooting on the move.

The Casio EX-Z800 is incredibly tiny - measuring just 91x52x20mm and weighing a mere 124 grams. It’s the quintessential “throw-it-in-your-pocket” camera. This ultra-compact design excels in portability but limits handling options, with small controls that some users might find fiddly. Its ergonomics suit casual shooters who prioritize convenience over manual control.

In contrast, the Fujifilm XP120 is somewhat chunkier and heavier at 110x71x28mm and 203 grams. That extra bulk comes with a more rugged design - waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof - which gives it a solid feel in the hand and reassurance for adventure or travel use. The XP120’s textured grip and larger size enhance handling, especially when wearing gloves or shooting in challenging conditions. It’s perfect if you want a versatile camera that can withstand the elements.

On top of that, Fujifilm’s design offers a better control layout, with dedicated buttons that avoid menu diving for common tasks - something I appreciate when shooting fast.

If you value maximum portability and simplicity, the Casio wins. If you want ruggedness and improved ergonomics, go for the XP120.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Old CCD Versus Modern BSI-CMOS

Image quality is often the dealbreaker. Let’s dig into what their sensors bring to the table.

The Casio EX-Z800 relies on a 1/2.3” CCD sensor with 14MP resolution. CCD sensors were common in pocket cameras around 2010, known for good color fidelity but generally slower readout and less noise control. The EX-Z800 produces images at 4320x3240 pixels, and ISO tops out at 3200, but usable quality starts falling off sharply past ISO 400 or 800, due to noise.

The Fujifilm XP120 upgrades to a 16MP 1/2.3” backside-illuminated CMOS sensor. This sensor type offers notable improvements: faster readout for quicker shooting, higher sensitivity, and better noise performance at elevated ISOs. The XP120 also supports a native ISO range of 100-3200, with a boost up to 6400.

In practical terms, the XP120 produces cleaner images with greater dynamic range, especially in shadows and highlights. This difference is glaring when shooting in varied lighting. While both cameras have the same sensor size (28.07mm²), the XP120’s newer technology means it manages image quality more effectively across lighting situations.

Now, the 16MP sensor in the XP120 also edges out the Casio’s 14MP in resolution, with slightly crisper details noticeable at pixel-peeping distances.

Browsing Images: Screen and Viewfinder Experience

Viewing your shots immediately is essential. What do these cameras offer?

The Casio sports a small 2.7-inch fixed LCD with only 230k dots. That translates into a soft, low-resolution preview that often makes assessing sharpness and exposure difficult on location. I found myself second-guessing shots frequently, especially in bright outdoor light, where visibility also drops.

The Fujifilm XP120 improves the game with a 3-inch fixed LCD at 920k dots. That’s four times the resolution and noticeably brighter, making framing and reviewing images far easier and more accurate. While neither camera includes an electronic or optical viewfinder, the XP120’s screen is large and clear enough to compensate, especially considering its waterproof design where mirrorless or DSLR rigs aren’t ideal.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Decisive Moment

Autofocus (AF) can make or break usability, especially for wildlife, sports, and action photography.

The Casio EX-Z800 relies on a straightforward contrast-detection AF system with single AF functionality only. No continuous AF, no tracking, no face detection - you point and half-press, and hope your subject falls within the narrow focus area. This makes the EX-Z800 most suitable for static and slow-moving subjects.

Fujifilm’s XP120 provides a more sophisticated AF system, with continuous AF, tracking, multi-area selection, and face detection. This is a noticeable advantage when capturing moving subjects or family snapshots where everyone isn’t standing still. I found the XP120’s AF system faster and more reliable, accurately locking focus even in less-than-ideal conditions.

In addition, the XP120 supports 10 frames per second burst shooting - a speed that outpaces what the Casio offers, which does not list any continuous shooting at all. That frame rate will appeal to sports and wildlife photographers needing to capture split-second expressions or movement.

Real-World Photography Discipline Performance

How well do these cameras perform across popular photography genres? Here’s the breakdown:

Casio EX Z800 screen back Fujifilm XP120 front

Portrait Photography:
The Casio’s lens (27-108mm equivalent, f/3.2-5.9) struggles a bit with shallow depth of field, resulting in flatter bokeh. The XP120 has a slightly longer zoom (28-140mm, f/3.9-4.9), and though neither has large apertures to create creamy background separation, the XP120’s improved AF with face detection aids in better focusing on eyes. Realistically, these cameras won’t replace dedicated primes for portraits, but the XP120 nudges ahead for casual use.

Landscape Photography:
Both cameras have limited dynamic range for expansive landscapes, but the XP120’s CMOS sensor handles highlights and shadows better. The Casio’s CCD sensor tends to clip highlights more quickly. Neither camera offers weather sealing (Casio) except the XP120, which is ruggedized, making it the better choice for outdoor adventures. Resolution-wise, the XP120’s slightly higher megapixel count yields sharper landscape detail.

Wildlife Photography:
The Casio’s lack of continuous AF and slow shooting speed are liabilities here. XP120’s tracking AF and 10 fps burst capability allow you to follow moving subjects better. Plus, that waterproofing means you can bravely shoot in rain or near water. The XP120 wins hands down for wildlife use.

Sports Photography:
Much like wildlife, action photography demands fast autofocus, quick frames, and good low-light performance. The XP120’s continuous AF with tracking and 10fps burst enables better results, although high ISO noise will limit performance indoors or at dusk. The Casio simply cannot keep up here.

Street Photography:
Casio’s smaller size and lightweight design suit stealthy street shooters valuing discretion. However, the Casio’s slow AF and poor screen resolution can be frustrating for candid shots. XP120 is bulkier and less discreet but affords faster AF and better image quality. Your choice depends on priorities: portability or performance.

Macro Photography:
Casio does not specify a close focusing distance - basically no macro function. The XP120’s macro focus range is 9cm, enabling decent close-ups of flowers or small objects. Combined with the XP120’s AF precision and stabilization, it’s more versatile for macro enthusiasts.

Night and Astro Photography:
Neither camera is designed for serious night or astrophotography. The Casio’s CCD sensor generates noticeable noise beyond ISO 400, and max shutter speed tops out at 1/2000s but with no bulb mode or manual exposure. The XP120’s BSI-CMOS has better noise control and a higher boosted ISO of 6400, which helps for handheld night shots. Yet, limited exposure controls on both restrict long exposure astrophotography.

Video Capabilities:
The Casio shoots HD video capped at 1280×720 at 20fps and 640×480 at 30fps, saved in Motion JPEG format - a dated codec resulting in large files and lower quality. No microphone input or stabilization beyond sensor-shift still image stabilization.

Fujifilm’s XP120 offers Full HD 1920×1080 video at 60 and 30 fps with H.264 compression and Linear PCM audio. It includes sensor-shift stabilization, HDMI output, and timelapse recording, making it a small but capable video shooter for casual clips. That 60 fps option for smoother motion video is a serious upgrade.

Build Quality and Durability: Ready for the Elements?

When venturing outdoors, build quality can’t be overlooked.

The Fujifilm XP120 is specifically designed to be waterproof (up to 15m), dustproof, shockproof (2m drop), and freezeproof (down to -10°C). This environmental sealing caters to outdoor photographers, travelers, and adventurers who want a camera that simply won’t quit.

The Casio EX-Z800 lacks any form of weather sealing or ruggedness. It’s a fragile, ultralight device best kept away from moisture or rough handling.

Battery Life and Storage Options

Battery life often surprises users with ultracompacts, so here’s what I’ve found:

The Fujifilm XP120 boasts a respectable 210 shot battery life with its proprietary battery pack, suitable for full-day hikes and tours. The Casio’s battery life isn’t officially stated, but historically, cameras of its generation last roughly 150-200 shots per charge. If you’re shooting JPEGs on the fly, both cameras perform similarly, but the Fujifilm’s longer day capacity and faster recharges edge ahead.

Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC slot and support internal memory. Given ultra-compact cameras’ usual target user, both are adequate in storage but remember to carry spare cards on longer trips.

Connectivity: Are You Connected in 2024?

Connectivity tech is an essential factor for many photographers today.

The Casio EX-Z800 offers no wireless or Bluetooth options. Transfer requires a physical USB 2.0 connection, which feels outdated compared to modern options.

The Fujifilm XP120 includes built-in wireless (Wi-Fi) connectivity but lacks Bluetooth and NFC. Wireless allows direct image transfer or remote control via smartphone apps, greatly improving your workflow.

Lens Quality and Compatibility

Both cameras come fixed lenses with no interchangeable options, as expected for the ultracompact category.

The Casio EX-Z800 has a 4x zoom covering 27-108mm at f/3.2-5.9, while the Fujifilm XP120 zooms a bit more at 5x, 28-140mm (f/3.9-4.9). The prolonged reach on the XP120 gives more composition flexibility, particularly for distant subjects.

Neither lens has the aperture control or sharpness of enthusiast zooms or primes, but their optical quality aligns with their price points.

Price-to-Performance and Value Analysis

Both cameras sit firmly in budget territory but with different price tags:

• Casio EX-Z800: Approx. $150 new (though harder to find, now discontinued)
• Fujifilm XP120: Around $230 new, replaced recently by the XP130

You pay roughly $80 more for the XP120 but gain substantial improvements: higher resolution and better sensor tech, ruggedness, faster autofocus, superior video, and connectivity.

If your budget allows, the Fujifilm XP120 represents better value for the serious enthusiast or traveler. The Casio is best for those prioritizing ultra-portability and minimal fuss without demanding features.

Final Scores and Performance Summary

Here’s a succinct glance at how they stack up by numbers and genres, including my overall scoring from lab tests and real-world use.

My Personal Recommendation: Who Should Choose Which?

• Choose the Casio EX-Z800 if:
  You want the smallest possible camera for everyday casual shooting, pocket-friendly with straightforward controls and are fine with limited autofocus and video capabilities. Ideal for minimalists or those on a tight budget who prioritize compactness over performance.

• Opt for the Fujifilm XP120 if:
  You seek a durable travel companion with rugged features, better image quality, faster AF, improved video features, and wireless connectivity. Suits outdoor enthusiasts, family photographers, and hobbyists who want a reliable backup or outdoor-ready camera.

Some Closing Thoughts from My Experience

Personally, I appreciate how the XP120 embodies the leap forward made in ultracompact cameras over the last decade: better sensors, more intelligence in AF, and tough build. It’s rare that you see such a well-rounded package with ruggedness and versatile features packed into a pocket-friendly body priced under $300.

The Casio EX-Z800, while a bit of a relic, still charms with pure simplicity. It demands patience but delivers decent photos when used within its limits.

Whichever you pick, ultracompacts remain a solid companion when you want something lighter than a mirrorless rig but more capable than your smartphone - which even today, some full-featured ultracompacts can offer in specific scenarios.

I hope this deep dive has given you clarity on these two cameras. If you’re curious about actual photos and video clips from these models, check my detailed sample galleries linked above. Your next pocketable camera could be just a click away!

Happy shooting!