Casio EX-Z800 vs Olympus TG-870
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z800 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z800 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-Z800 and Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the TG-870 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z800 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the TG-870 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-Z800 matches up versus the TG-870 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z800 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z800 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-Z800
| TG-870 | EX-Z800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2016 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 66 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z800 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z800 has outer dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z800 and Olympus TG-870 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z800 versus the TG-870.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and TG-870 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z800 and TG-870.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus TG-870 to render extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z800 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-08-03 | 2016-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 221 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-120 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $150 | $280 |