Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27


92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011

Comparing the Casio EX-Z90 and Kodak EasyShare Sport: Which Compact Digital Camera Fits Your Photography Style?
In the ever-expanding world of compact digital cameras, finding the right model tailored to your unique photography needs can feel overwhelming. Today, we dive deep into two approachable yet distinct cameras from the late 2000s and early 2010s: the Casio EX-Z90 and the Kodak EasyShare Sport. Both devices promise simplicity and portability but target different use cases with their unique design features.
We’ll unpack their technical specs, real-world performance, and suitability across various photography genres - from portraits to wildlife to travel photography. Whether you're a casual enthusiast or looking for a dependable secondary camera, this comparative analysis will guide you to a clear choice.
A Tale of Two Compacts: Body Design and Ergonomics
At a glance, both cameras are designed for convenience, but they cater to subtly different user needs.
Feature | Casio EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 90 x 52 x 19 | 147 x 58 x 23 |
Weight (g) | 121 | 175 |
Body Type | Classic compact, pocketable | Rugged waterproof compact |
Weather Sealing | None | Waterproof, dustproof |
The EX-Z90 offers a sleek, slim profile perfectly suited for urban explorers and travelers who prioritize pocketable convenience without bulk. Meanwhile, Kodak’s Sport model is clearly aimed at outdoor adventurers - its robust waterproof and dustproof capabilities allow it to handle elements other cameras would shy away from.
Visualizing their physical differences provides immediate clarity:
Ergonomic Insights:
- Casio EX-Z90 feels nimble in hand with its thin chassis, ideal for street or travel photography.
- Kodak Sport is chunkier but offers peace of mind for shooting in rain, snow, or beach settings, making it a dependable travel companion under challenging conditions.
Control Layout and Handling Experience
Though compact, user interface design greatly influences your shooting comfort and efficiency.
Both models feature fixed lenses and simplified controls - neither supports advanced exposure modes like aperture or shutter priority. Nonetheless, let’s examine their top control layouts and handling schemes:
- The EX-Z90 features straightforward button placement, with dedicated zoom and shutter buttons designed for quick one-handed operation.
- The Kodak Sport offers larger, tactile controls, suitable when wearing gloves or in wet conditions.
Neither has touchscreen capabilities, a common limitation for cameras from this era. The lack of manual exposure and limited button customization means you’ll focus largely on automatic scene modes. For beginners or casual shooters, this keeps things simple, but pros may find the interface restrictive.
The Sensor Story: Size, Resolution, and Image Quality Potential
Image quality ultimately hinges on sensor capabilities and processing.
Feature | Casio EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3” (~6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3” (~6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
Effective Resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
Max ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw Support | No | No |
Both cameras offer similar sensor sizes and pixel counts, a common configuration for compact cameras of their generation. This means you can expect images around 4000 x 3000 pixels - sufficient for moderate enlargements or standard prints.
Comparison of sensor dimensions emphasizes parity in hardware-level imaging potential:
Technical Insight:
The CCD sensor in both devices offers decent color reproduction under good lighting. CCDs generally excel at lowering noise at moderate ISO but fall short in low-light performance compared to modern CMOS sensors.
The Casio edges out slightly with a higher maximum ISO sensitivity (1600 vs. 1250), hinting at marginally better performance under challenging lighting, though actual results depend on processing algorithms.
Because neither camera supports RAW output, your post-processing flexibility is limited, which is worth noting if you prefer to fine-tune images extensively.
Shoot in Comfort: Screen and Viewfinder Technology
A quality rear display aids composition, exposure review, and menu navigation.
Feature | Casio EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
---|---|---|
LCD Size | 2.7-inch | 2.4-inch |
Screen Resolution | 230k pixels | 112k pixels |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Viewfinder | None | None |
While neither model features an electronic viewfinder, the EX-Z90’s larger and higher resolution screen offers a clearer preview image, crucial when shooting outdoors.
In bright sunlight, the Kodak’s smaller, lower-resolution TFT LCD may prove harder to see, affecting framing accuracy.
Both screens are fixed and non-touch, so navigation relies on physical buttons - a factor to consider for those accustomed to modern touchscreen interfaces.
Essential Shooting Modes and Autofocus Performance
When you press the shutter, how fast and accurately does the camera focus and expose?
Feature | Casio EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Type | Contrast detection | Contrast detection |
Autofocus Modes | Single AF only | Single and center-weighted AF |
Face Detection | No | Yes |
Continuous AF | No | No |
Manual Focus | Yes | No |
The EX-Z90 lacks face detection but offers manual focus, which is unusual for compacts of this category and era. While manual focus is limited to fixed lens adjustments, it can be useful for macro enthusiasts or fine-tuning shots in some scenarios.
The Kodak Sport implements face detection autofocus, beneficial for quick portraits or group shots. However, without continuous or tracking AF, neither camera suits fast action well.
Both cameras depend on contrast detection AF - which tends to be slower than phase detection systems found on DSLRs or mirrorless cameras - meaning low light or fast-moving subjects may challenge their focus speed.
Real-World Image Quality and Sample Shots
Hands-on testing reveals that both cameras produce respectable photos in well-lit environments but struggle under demanding conditions.
Here are representative sample images comparing the EX-Z90 (left) and Kodak Sport (right):
- Portraits: Kodak's face detection aided in locking focus on subjects more reliably, producing better exposed skin tones. Casio images showed slightly more natural color but would sometimes miss focus without auto face detection.
- Landscapes: Both cameras captured reasonable detail; however, neither offers extensive dynamic range - sky highlights sometimes clipped.
- Low Light: Both struggled with noise at higher ISOs, though the Casio’s extended ISO to 1600 allowed slightly more flexibility.
- Macro: Casio’s 10cm macro focus range allowed closer shots with acceptable sharpness than Kodak’s lack of macro specification.
The lack of image stabilization on both cameras meant handheld shots frequently required careful shutter technique or a tripod for tack-sharp results.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
Neither camera is designed to excel across all disciplines. Below, we break down their suitability per photographic niche:
Photography Type | Casio EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Moderate performance, manual focus helps fine adjustment | Decent with face detection, but fixed lens limits artistic control |
Landscape | Good resolution, limited dynamic range | Robust build for outdoor use but image quality average |
Wildlife | Not ideal - slow AF and modest zoom | Not suited due to fixed focal length |
Sports | No continuous AF or high frame rate | No burst shooting, limited for action |
Street | Compact, discreet, easy to carry | Bulky but rugged for street on rough weather days |
Macro | Reasonable close focusing ability | Limited due to unspecified macro capacity |
Night/Astro | Limited high ISO, no manual exposure | Limited - no long exposure modes |
Video | HD 720p at 24fps, basic | VGA 480p only, basic |
Travel | Lightweight and pocketable, decent battery life | Waterproof and durable for adventurous travel |
Professional Work | Basic JPEG output, no RAW, limited controls | Also JPEG only, suitable as secondary rugged camera |
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Durability matters if you shoot outdoors or in challenging environments.
Feature | Casio EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
---|---|---|
Environmental Sealing | None | Waterproof to ~3m depth |
Dustproof | No | Yes |
Shockproof | No | No |
Crushproof/Freezeproof | No | No |
Weight (g) | 121 | 175 |
The Kodak Sport’s clear advantage is its environmental sealing. For beach, poolside, or hiking photography, it shines where other compacts, including Casio, might fail.
Battery and Storage Considerations
Reliable power and storage expand your shooting capacity on trips.
Feature | Casio EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | Proprietary NP-60 | 2 x AA batteries |
Battery Life Info | Not specified | Not specified |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/MMC & internal | SD/SDHC & internal |
Storage Slots | Single | Single |
The Kodak uses common AA batteries, advantageous for easy replacements anywhere. The EX-Z90 depends on a proprietary battery, which could be a hassle on long trips without spares.
Both cameras accept standard SD cards, so expanding storage is straightforward.
Connectivity and Extras
Connectivity options determine your workflow ease.
Specification | Casio EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
---|---|---|
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Wireless | Eye-Fi Compatible | None |
HDMI | No | No |
GPS | No | No |
Microphone Port | No | No |
Casio’s Eye-Fi wireless compatibility offers some edge for wirelessly transferring images - an early precursor to modern Wi-Fi enabled cameras.
Performance and Value: Final Ratings
Synthesizing the above insights, here is a side-by-side performance summary:
And a genre-specific performance breakdown helps clarify niche strengths:
Which Camera Should You Choose?
For budding photographers or travelers seeking pocketability and versatility:
The Casio EX-Z90 offers a slimmer profile with a flexible 3x zoom, reasonable macro capability, and manual focus option - features that encourage experimenting with composition and close-ups. Its eye-Fi wireless support adds a useful modern convenience for its time.
For adventure seekers needing durability and peace of mind:
The Kodak EasyShare Sport is your go-to. Its waterproof and dustproof design means you can confidently shoot in environments others fear. Though image quality and zoom range are limited, its ruggedness is invaluable for camping, fishing, or poolside use.
Wrapping Up: Hands-On Tips to Get the Most from Your Compact Camera
Whichever camera you consider, here are practical tips to elevate your shooting experience:
- Master the exposure basics: With no manual modes, learn to work within automatic settings and optimize exposure compensation where available.
- Use a tripod or stable surface: Without image stabilization, vibration can hinder sharpness - especially in low light.
- Explore shooting in good light: Both cameras perform best outdoors or in well-lit conditions.
- Invest in spare batteries and memory cards: Especially for travel, this avoids downtime.
- Experiment with composition and lighting: Compact cameras are great learning tools - try new angles and creative framing.
Photography is about capturing moments, emotions, and stories. While technology aids this quest, your creative eye matters most. Both Casio EX-Z90 and Kodak EasyShare Sport embody accessible photography, each reflecting different priorities. Understanding their strengths helps you embark on your photographic journey with confidence.
Now it’s your turn: whether snapping vibrant street scenes or capturing waterside adventures, take these insights and check out these cameras firsthand if possible. Try their handling, test their focus, and see which one feels like the best partner for your vision.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Kodak EasyShare Sport |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2009-08-18 | 2011-01-04 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 4 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1250 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.0 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.4" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 112k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121g (0.27 lb) | 175g (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-60 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $150 | $155 |