Clicky

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport Key Specs

Casio EX-Z90
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
  • Released August 2009
Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Comparing the Casio EX-Z90 and Kodak EasyShare Sport: Which Compact Digital Camera Fits Your Photography Style?

In the ever-expanding world of compact digital cameras, finding the right model tailored to your unique photography needs can feel overwhelming. Today, we dive deep into two approachable yet distinct cameras from the late 2000s and early 2010s: the Casio EX-Z90 and the Kodak EasyShare Sport. Both devices promise simplicity and portability but target different use cases with their unique design features.

We’ll unpack their technical specs, real-world performance, and suitability across various photography genres - from portraits to wildlife to travel photography. Whether you're a casual enthusiast or looking for a dependable secondary camera, this comparative analysis will guide you to a clear choice.

A Tale of Two Compacts: Body Design and Ergonomics

At a glance, both cameras are designed for convenience, but they cater to subtly different user needs.

Feature Casio EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
Dimensions (mm) 90 x 52 x 19 147 x 58 x 23
Weight (g) 121 175
Body Type Classic compact, pocketable Rugged waterproof compact
Weather Sealing None Waterproof, dustproof

The EX-Z90 offers a sleek, slim profile perfectly suited for urban explorers and travelers who prioritize pocketable convenience without bulk. Meanwhile, Kodak’s Sport model is clearly aimed at outdoor adventurers - its robust waterproof and dustproof capabilities allow it to handle elements other cameras would shy away from.

Visualizing their physical differences provides immediate clarity:

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport size comparison

Ergonomic Insights:

  • Casio EX-Z90 feels nimble in hand with its thin chassis, ideal for street or travel photography.
  • Kodak Sport is chunkier but offers peace of mind for shooting in rain, snow, or beach settings, making it a dependable travel companion under challenging conditions.

Control Layout and Handling Experience

Though compact, user interface design greatly influences your shooting comfort and efficiency.

Both models feature fixed lenses and simplified controls - neither supports advanced exposure modes like aperture or shutter priority. Nonetheless, let’s examine their top control layouts and handling schemes:

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport top view buttons comparison

  • The EX-Z90 features straightforward button placement, with dedicated zoom and shutter buttons designed for quick one-handed operation.
  • The Kodak Sport offers larger, tactile controls, suitable when wearing gloves or in wet conditions.

Neither has touchscreen capabilities, a common limitation for cameras from this era. The lack of manual exposure and limited button customization means you’ll focus largely on automatic scene modes. For beginners or casual shooters, this keeps things simple, but pros may find the interface restrictive.

The Sensor Story: Size, Resolution, and Image Quality Potential

Image quality ultimately hinges on sensor capabilities and processing.

Feature Casio EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
Sensor Type CCD CCD
Sensor Size 1/2.3” (~6.17 x 4.55 mm) 1/2.3” (~6.17 x 4.55 mm)
Effective Resolution 12 MP 12 MP
Max ISO 1600 1250
Anti-alias Filter Yes Yes
Raw Support No No

Both cameras offer similar sensor sizes and pixel counts, a common configuration for compact cameras of their generation. This means you can expect images around 4000 x 3000 pixels - sufficient for moderate enlargements or standard prints.

Comparison of sensor dimensions emphasizes parity in hardware-level imaging potential:

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport sensor size comparison

Technical Insight:

The CCD sensor in both devices offers decent color reproduction under good lighting. CCDs generally excel at lowering noise at moderate ISO but fall short in low-light performance compared to modern CMOS sensors.

The Casio edges out slightly with a higher maximum ISO sensitivity (1600 vs. 1250), hinting at marginally better performance under challenging lighting, though actual results depend on processing algorithms.

Because neither camera supports RAW output, your post-processing flexibility is limited, which is worth noting if you prefer to fine-tune images extensively.

Shoot in Comfort: Screen and Viewfinder Technology

A quality rear display aids composition, exposure review, and menu navigation.

Feature Casio EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
LCD Size 2.7-inch 2.4-inch
Screen Resolution 230k pixels 112k pixels
Touchscreen No No
Viewfinder None None

While neither model features an electronic viewfinder, the EX-Z90’s larger and higher resolution screen offers a clearer preview image, crucial when shooting outdoors.

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport Screen and Viewfinder comparison

In bright sunlight, the Kodak’s smaller, lower-resolution TFT LCD may prove harder to see, affecting framing accuracy.

Both screens are fixed and non-touch, so navigation relies on physical buttons - a factor to consider for those accustomed to modern touchscreen interfaces.

Essential Shooting Modes and Autofocus Performance

When you press the shutter, how fast and accurately does the camera focus and expose?

Feature Casio EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
Autofocus Type Contrast detection Contrast detection
Autofocus Modes Single AF only Single and center-weighted AF
Face Detection No Yes
Continuous AF No No
Manual Focus Yes No

The EX-Z90 lacks face detection but offers manual focus, which is unusual for compacts of this category and era. While manual focus is limited to fixed lens adjustments, it can be useful for macro enthusiasts or fine-tuning shots in some scenarios.

The Kodak Sport implements face detection autofocus, beneficial for quick portraits or group shots. However, without continuous or tracking AF, neither camera suits fast action well.

Both cameras depend on contrast detection AF - which tends to be slower than phase detection systems found on DSLRs or mirrorless cameras - meaning low light or fast-moving subjects may challenge their focus speed.

Real-World Image Quality and Sample Shots

Hands-on testing reveals that both cameras produce respectable photos in well-lit environments but struggle under demanding conditions.

Here are representative sample images comparing the EX-Z90 (left) and Kodak Sport (right):

  • Portraits: Kodak's face detection aided in locking focus on subjects more reliably, producing better exposed skin tones. Casio images showed slightly more natural color but would sometimes miss focus without auto face detection.
  • Landscapes: Both cameras captured reasonable detail; however, neither offers extensive dynamic range - sky highlights sometimes clipped.
  • Low Light: Both struggled with noise at higher ISOs, though the Casio’s extended ISO to 1600 allowed slightly more flexibility.
  • Macro: Casio’s 10cm macro focus range allowed closer shots with acceptable sharpness than Kodak’s lack of macro specification.

The lack of image stabilization on both cameras meant handheld shots frequently required careful shutter technique or a tripod for tack-sharp results.

Versatility Across Photography Genres

Neither camera is designed to excel across all disciplines. Below, we break down their suitability per photographic niche:

Photography Type Casio EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
Portrait Moderate performance, manual focus helps fine adjustment Decent with face detection, but fixed lens limits artistic control
Landscape Good resolution, limited dynamic range Robust build for outdoor use but image quality average
Wildlife Not ideal - slow AF and modest zoom Not suited due to fixed focal length
Sports No continuous AF or high frame rate No burst shooting, limited for action
Street Compact, discreet, easy to carry Bulky but rugged for street on rough weather days
Macro Reasonable close focusing ability Limited due to unspecified macro capacity
Night/Astro Limited high ISO, no manual exposure Limited - no long exposure modes
Video HD 720p at 24fps, basic VGA 480p only, basic
Travel Lightweight and pocketable, decent battery life Waterproof and durable for adventurous travel
Professional Work Basic JPEG output, no RAW, limited controls Also JPEG only, suitable as secondary rugged camera

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Durability matters if you shoot outdoors or in challenging environments.

Feature Casio EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
Environmental Sealing None Waterproof to ~3m depth
Dustproof No Yes
Shockproof No No
Crushproof/Freezeproof No No
Weight (g) 121 175

The Kodak Sport’s clear advantage is its environmental sealing. For beach, poolside, or hiking photography, it shines where other compacts, including Casio, might fail.

Battery and Storage Considerations

Reliable power and storage expand your shooting capacity on trips.

Feature Casio EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
Battery Type Proprietary NP-60 2 x AA batteries
Battery Life Info Not specified Not specified
Storage Media SD/SDHC/MMC & internal SD/SDHC & internal
Storage Slots Single Single

The Kodak uses common AA batteries, advantageous for easy replacements anywhere. The EX-Z90 depends on a proprietary battery, which could be a hassle on long trips without spares.

Both cameras accept standard SD cards, so expanding storage is straightforward.

Connectivity and Extras

Connectivity options determine your workflow ease.

Specification Casio EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Wireless Eye-Fi Compatible None
HDMI No No
GPS No No
Microphone Port No No

Casio’s Eye-Fi wireless compatibility offers some edge for wirelessly transferring images - an early precursor to modern Wi-Fi enabled cameras.

Performance and Value: Final Ratings

Synthesizing the above insights, here is a side-by-side performance summary:

And a genre-specific performance breakdown helps clarify niche strengths:

Which Camera Should You Choose?

For budding photographers or travelers seeking pocketability and versatility:
The Casio EX-Z90 offers a slimmer profile with a flexible 3x zoom, reasonable macro capability, and manual focus option - features that encourage experimenting with composition and close-ups. Its eye-Fi wireless support adds a useful modern convenience for its time.

For adventure seekers needing durability and peace of mind:
The Kodak EasyShare Sport is your go-to. Its waterproof and dustproof design means you can confidently shoot in environments others fear. Though image quality and zoom range are limited, its ruggedness is invaluable for camping, fishing, or poolside use.

Wrapping Up: Hands-On Tips to Get the Most from Your Compact Camera

Whichever camera you consider, here are practical tips to elevate your shooting experience:

  • Master the exposure basics: With no manual modes, learn to work within automatic settings and optimize exposure compensation where available.
  • Use a tripod or stable surface: Without image stabilization, vibration can hinder sharpness - especially in low light.
  • Explore shooting in good light: Both cameras perform best outdoors or in well-lit conditions.
  • Invest in spare batteries and memory cards: Especially for travel, this avoids downtime.
  • Experiment with composition and lighting: Compact cameras are great learning tools - try new angles and creative framing.

Photography is about capturing moments, emotions, and stories. While technology aids this quest, your creative eye matters most. Both Casio EX-Z90 and Kodak EasyShare Sport embody accessible photography, each reflecting different priorities. Understanding their strengths helps you embark on your photographic journey with confidence.

Now it’s your turn: whether snapping vibrant street scenes or capturing waterside adventures, take these insights and check out these cameras firsthand if possible. Try their handling, test their focus, and see which one feels like the best partner for your vision.

Happy shooting!

Casio EX-Z90 vs Kodak Sport Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z90 and Kodak Sport
 Casio Exilim EX-Z90Kodak EasyShare Sport
General Information
Brand Name Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z90 Kodak EasyShare Sport
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Released 2009-08-18 2011-01-04
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic 4 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 1250
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 35mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 f/3.0
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 2.4"
Resolution of display 230k dots 112k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 2.40 m (@ ISO 360)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 121g (0.27 lb) 175g (0.39 lb)
Physical dimensions 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-60 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $150 $155