Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-4
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Olympus TG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-ZR10 was brought out 5 years before the TG-4 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR10 matches up versus the TG-4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus TG-4
EX-ZR10 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Casio EX-ZR10
TG-4 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | September 2010 | Fresher by 55 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus TG-4
EX-ZR10 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR10 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR10 versus Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the TG-4.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and TG-4 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and TG-4.
As you can see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to show extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-09-20 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $190 | $379 |