Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic LX7
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39


86 Imaging
35 Features
61 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic LX7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-90mm (F1.4-2.3) lens
- 298g - 111 x 68 x 46mm
- Announced October 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic LX5
- Renewed by Panasonic LX10

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic LX7: A Thorough Compact Camera Duel for the Discerning Photographer
When hunting for a compact camera that punches above its weight, the Casio EX-ZR100 and the Panasonic LX7 often pop up as contenders from an era when small-sensor compacts hit a sweet spot - offering lightweight portability but enough manual control and image quality to sate enthusiasts and professionals on the go. Both cherished for their fixed lenses and pocketable bodies, these cameras claim virtues in different directions: Casio’s superzoom reach versus Panasonic’s bright optics. But which one truly deserves your hard-earned dollars and backpack space in 2024?
Having spent weeks side-by-side field testing, pushing them around various shooting scenarios and analyzing their technical chops, I’m here to unravel the practical realities behind their spec sheets and marketing hype. Let’s dive in and see which camera earns the title “companion for your creative adventures.”
First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Handling
If cameras had first dates, these two would show up dressed very differently.
The Casio EX-ZR100 is classically compact - think pocket-sized superzoom with a 24–300mm (12.5x!) reach - but it’s featherweight at only 204 grams and slim dimensions of 105 x 59 x 29 mm. It feels nimble, barely noticeable slung off your neck or tucked in a jacket pocket. On the flip side, its styling is somewhat utilitarian - no flashy design flourishes, but thoughtfully laid out with a fixed 3” Super Clear TFT LCD.
The Panasonic LX7 is the heftier contender, at 298 grams and chunkier dimensions of 111 x 68 x 46 mm. You feel the difference in hand immediately - more solid, more substantial, and frankly more premium in finish. The LX7’s robust body may not slip into tight pant pockets comfortably but is comfortable for prolonged shooting, with a deeper grip that harks back to larger sensor compacts.
When I compared their top view layouts, you see this difference translate into control access. The LX7 sports a traditional PASM dial, dedicated rings for aperture and zoom, and easy thumb access controls - making manual shooting a breeze, particularly for mechanical aperture adjustments. The Casio, on the other hand, relies more on digital menus through button presses with fewer physical dials, which feels more compact but slower during action.
Takeaway: If you value being ultra-light and pocketable, Casio wins hands down. But for dials, buttons, and tactile love, the LX7’s ergonomics edge out as more photographer-friendly.
Sensor & Image Quality: Size Matters, But How Much?
Let’s geek out for a moment. Sensor size sets the groundwork for image quality, noise control, and dynamic range. The ZR100 uses a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm), while the Panasonic LX7 employs a larger 1/1.7" CMOS sensor (7.44 x 5.58 mm). Don’t let those fractions confuse you - this translates to the LX7’s sensor having roughly 1.5x the surface area, a sizable boost in light-gathering capability.
Casio’s sensor packs 12 megapixels (max 4000x3000 resolution), whereas Panasonic chooses 10 megapixels (3648 x 2736) with an anti-aliasing filter on both systems. Although the megapixel difference is negligible, the LX7 benefits from better pixel pitch and improved low light performance, further amplified by Panasonic’s Venus Engine image processor.
In real-world testing, this manifests in the LX7 delivering cleaner images at higher ISO settings, preserving color fidelity and fine detail without nasty digital artifacts. The EX-ZR100, while respectable in daylight, starts struggling beyond ISO 800 with increased grain and softer textures. Panasonic’s native ISO 80 to 6400 spectrum also includes boost up to ISO 12800, which, while noisy, still impresses for its class.
Details like color depth and dynamic range show Panasonic pulling ahead by a comfortable margin on DxO Mark scores (even if Casio went untested formally). The LX7’s better highlight retention and shadow recovery give landscapes and portrait skin tones a more natural gradation, critical for demanding shooters.
Optics & Lens Versatility: Zoom vs Speed
Optically, the cameras diverge significantly. Casio's EX-ZR100 stands out with an ambitious 24-300mm equivalent zoom, a whopping 12.5x optical zoom range. Impressive on paper and wonderful for wildlife or sports where reach matters, however, faster lenses often suffer at telephoto lengths, losing sharpness and brightness.
The Panasonic LX7 plays a different game with a wider 24-90mm (3.8x zoom) but with a famously bright F1.4-2.3 Leica-branded lens. This aperture is exceptional, particularly at the wide end, allowing superb low-light performance, creamy bokeh for portraits, and shallow depth of field effects - not exactly common in compacts.
In use, I found the LX7’s lens delivers contrasty, tack-sharp images and excels for indoor shooting or creative control over background blur. The Casio’s zoom extends your framing options enormously, but wide-open apertures max out at F3.0 at 24mm and drift to F5.9 telephoto, which can necessitate higher ISOs or slower shutter speeds.
Moreover, focusing speeds differ. Casio’s contrast-detection AF is sluggish with no continuous AF or eye detection, suitable for still subjects only. Panasonic brings face detection and more reliable autofocus, plus continuous AF for moving scenes, making it far better for dynamic subjects.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance
Speaking of autofocus, the Panasonic LX7 boasts 23 focus points with face detection and continuous autofocus capabilities, a boon for street, sports, and wildlife photography where speed reigns. Casio EX-ZR100’s AF system is contrast-detection only, single-shot with multi-area selectable focus, lacking continuous or face/eye detection.
In burst shooting tests, Casio surprisingly offers a blistering 40 fps burst mode, albeit at reduced resolution and quality - but without continuous AF, it’s mostly a gimmick. Panasonic’s more modest 11 fps burst at full resolution with continuous AF offers a better balance between speed and usability.
The EX-ZR100’s shutter speeds range from 15s to 1/2000s - allowing some flexibility for night or daylight freeze frames, but the LX7 extends this with up to 1/4000s shutter speed, better for bright-light action.
Screen and Viewfinder Usability
Both cameras have 3-inch fixed screens, but there’s a quality gap. The Casio’s Super Clear TFT with 461k dots feels adequate but dull by today’s standards, lacking touch or articulation. The Panasonic panel nearly doubles that resolution at 920k dots, showing crisp images and a brighter display great for composing in bright sunlight.
Neither has a built-in viewfinder. The LX7 supports an optional electronic viewfinder attachment, a significant advantage in tricky light conditions or when you want that classic shooting stance. Casio completely omits this option, highlighting its budget-friendly leanings.
Video Capabilities: Which Wins the Moving Picture Race?
Video enthusiasts should note both cameras shoot Full HD 1080p, but here the LX7 shines with options for 60p and 50p modes (smooth motion), along with stereo sound via built-in microphones - plus AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats.
Casio caps at 1080p/30fps H.264 with mono audio. Slow-motion modes at low resolution are a fun extra on the ZR100, but generally, Panasonic's video is more robust and useful for casual filmmaking.
Neither camera supports external microphones or headphones making professional audio capture impossible without separate devices.
Build Quality & Weather Sealing
Neither camera claims rugged weather sealing, dustproofing, or freezeproofing. Panasonic’s build feels denser and sturdier - reassuring for outdoor travel - while Casio’s is lighter and more plastic-feeling.
Neither is shockproof or crushproof. So for adventure junkies, neither scores high here, but treat them gently and they last.
Battery Life and Storage
The LX7 uses proprietary battery packs rated around 330 shots per charge, outperforming many compacts of the era and enabling full-day shooting with spares.
Casio’s battery life is less clear from specs, often below 300 shots, requiring backups for serious trips.
Both use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with the Panasonic also offering internal storage (though limited).
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - a sign of their release time. Both have HDMI output and USB 2.0 for data transfer, but lack GPS and wireless remote options.
Casio lacks advanced bracketing but Panasonic includes AE and WB bracketing - handy for HDR enthusiasts.
Specialty Photography and Genre Suitability
Let's break down how these cameras fare across various photography niches - I've tested each across these disciplines and compiled the practical results:
Portraits: Who Nails Skin Tones and Eyes?
The Panasonic LX7’s brighter lens and face detection autofocus stand out for portraiture. The rich color rendition and pleasant bokeh from the F1.4 aperture create flattering skin tones and subject separation. Its 23 focus points with face detection reliably lock onto eyes, something I found missing on Casio’s EX-ZR100.
Casio’s deeper zoom can isolate faces at a distance but struggles in low light or to produce smooth backgrounds. Autofocus slowdowns were distracting during live sessions.
Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Resolution
Here the LX7, with its larger sensor and superior dynamic range (11.7 EV), captures more tonal detail in highlights and shadows. The EX-ZR100’s more modest sensor and lower dynamic range, combined with higher noise above ISO 400, limits it in demanding light.
Casio’s longer zoom is nice for distant landscape features but optical compromises at the long end reduce sharpness. For epic crisp landscapes, I lean Panasonic.
Wildlife and Sports: Speed and Reach Matter
Casio’s 12.5x zoom is tempting for wildlife shooters on a budget, but falters with slow autofocus and no continuous AF. Panasonic’s faster AF and continuous burst shooting feel smoother for tracking motion but its 3.8x zoom limits reach.
For action, Panasonic outperforms given faster shutter, AF tracking, and shot-to-shot readiness.
Street and Travel Photography: Discreteness & Portability
Casio’s slim profile reigns for unobtrusive street shooting, but the slower AF and lower light ability can frustrate. The LX7’s chunkier body is less stealthy but better in dim scenes and manual control makes it a versatile travel buddy.
Battery life favors Panasonic for all-day shooting.
Macro and Creative Close-up
The LX7’s macro focusing to 1cm, paired with bright aperture, is fantastic for detail work, while Casio’s specs lack notable macro capability.
Sample Images Gallery: Real-world Output
Here is a selection of unedited JPEG images straight from both cameras. Note the Panasonic’s richer colors and tighter details, especially in low light and portraits, versus Casio’s variability at zoom extremes.
Performance Ratings at a Glance
From my testing metrics - focusing speed, exposure accuracy, sharpness, and low light usability - the Panasonic LX7 claims a leading overall score, while Casio EX-ZR100 offers respectable value for its niche.
Which One Should You Buy? Recommendations
Choose the Casio EX-ZR100 if:
- You want an ultra-lightweight, pocketable superzoom compact
- Budget is tight, and zoom versatility beats low light finesse
- Your photography leans toward casual snaps of distant subjects
- You’re okay with slower AF and modest image quality at high ISO
Choose the Panasonic LX7 if:
- You crave superior image quality with larger sensor and Leica glass
- Manual controls and brighter aperture fuel your creative process
- You photograph portraits, low light scenes, or require fast autofocus
- Video in Full HD at 60fps matters
- You appreciate robust battery life and better build feel
Final Thoughts: Balancing Hype, Specs and Real-World Capability
In the wild world of compact cameras from the early 2010s, the Casio EX-ZR100 and Panasonic LX7 occupy adjacent but distinct realms. Casio aggressively markets reach and speed with its 12.5x zoom and high burst rates, but this comes at some cost to image quality and autofocus reliability. Panasonic prioritizes quality optics, sensor size, and shooting experience, sacrificing reach and tiny pocketability.
From my years of reviewing hundreds of cameras, the LX7 remains a small sensor compact classic revered for its balance of manual control, image excellence, and usability. Casio’s EX-ZR100, while niche, serves well as a travel zoom for those prioritizing reach and compactness over nuance.
Hopefully, this detailed, hands-on comparison helps you weight these factors and select the compact traveler or enthusiast camera best suited to your shooting style and budget. After all, the “right camera” is the one you enjoy using consistently - and these two offer very different flavors of photographic fun.
Happy shooting!
Note: All data and performance impressions reflect extensive personal testing under varied lighting, subjects, and using standardized focus/ISO/white balance methodology to provide an authentic, hands-on reader perspective.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Panasonic LX7 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Panasonic |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-10-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-90mm (3.8x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.4-2.3 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204 grams (0.45 pounds) | 298 grams (0.66 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 68 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 50 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 147 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $400 |