Clicky

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
46
Overall
39
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
32
Features
17
Overall
26

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Announced February 2009
  • Additionally Known as PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202: A Deep Dive Comparison for Every Photographer’s Needs

Choosing the right compact camera often means balancing features, image quality, and intended use. Whether you’re capturing breathtaking landscapes, fast-moving action, or everyday moments, knowing what your camera brings to the table is essential. Today, we’re examining two compact cameras that have carved their niches in the affordable compact segment: the Casio EX-ZR100 and the Samsung SL202. Both models target enthusiasts and casual shooters looking for pocket-sized versatility, but how do they stack up in real-world scenarios and technical performance? We’ve put these cameras side-by-side to provide you with honest, hands-on insights.

Let’s start by taking a look at their physical design and build.

Hands-On Feel and Handling: Size, Ergonomics, and Control Layout

How a camera feels in your hand affects how easily you shoot. The Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung SL202 differ noticeably in size and ergonomics.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

  • Casio EX-ZR100: Measuring 105 x 59 x 29 mm and weighing 204g, this camera has a relatively slim, rectangular profile. The slightly larger size accommodates more control options and a bigger grip, enhancing stability.
  • Samsung SL202: More compact at 92 x 61 x 23 mm and weighing 168g, the SL202 offers excellent portability. Its size and curvier design make it slip easily in a pocket for street and travel photography.

But size isn’t everything. Ergonomics depend on button placement and interface, which leads us into top-panel controls.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

  • Casio EX-ZR100: Features dedicated buttons for shutter priority, aperture priority, manual exposure, and exposure compensation. The layout is logically arranged, enabling faster operation for those who want quick access to creative controls.
  • Samsung SL202: Offers minimal external controls, with no manual exposure modes or dedicated exposure compensation buttons. This reflects its focus on ease-of-use for casual shooters rather than enthusiasts seeking advanced control.

If you prefer tactile control and manual shooting, the Casio clearly has the edge here. For grab-and-go simplicity, the Samsung shines in portability and straightforward operation.

Imaging Hardware: Sensor Technology & Image Quality

Ultimately, the sensor defines image quality and versatility. Both cameras share the same sensor size of 1/2.3" (around 28 mm² area) but use different sensor technologies and resolutions.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Specification Casio EX-ZR100 Samsung SL202
Sensor Type Backside Illuminated CMOS CCD
Sensor Size 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm)
Effective Resolution 12 Megapixels 10 Megapixels
Maximum ISO 3200 1600
Anti-Aliasing Filter Yes Yes
RAW Support No No

The Casio’s BSI-CMOS sensor advantage is significant. BSI (Backside Illuminated) sensors exhibit better light gathering ability, resulting in improved low-light performance and reduced noise - especially at higher ISOs. The extra 2 million pixels also offer marginally higher resolution.

On the other hand, the Samsung SL202’s CCD sensor is conventional for its era but tends to produce slightly smoother color rendition at base ISO and retains strong dynamic range in bright shooting conditions.

In practical terms:

  • Expect sharper, cleaner images with the Casio in low-light and indoor settings.
  • The Samsung offers solid image quality for daylight shooting but struggles more as ISO climbs past 400.
  • Neither supports RAW files, which constrains advanced post-processing flexibility.

Display and Framing: Screen Technology and Live View

Since both cameras lack viewfinders, their rear LCDs are critical for composing and reviewing shots.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • Casio EX-ZR100: A 3-inch fixed Super Clear TFT LCD with 461k-dot resolution. The screen is bright and crisp, providing excellent clarity even under sunlight. While it doesn’t have touch functionality, menu navigation is smooth through physical buttons.
  • Samsung SL202: Comes with a 2.7-inch LCD but at just 230k dots, it’s less vibrant and not as sharp. This affects your ability to verify focus details or exposure in challenging light.

While neither screen is articulating or touch-enabled, the Casio’s superior resolution greatly improves usability, especially when fine-tuning exposure or checking sharpness.

Lens Capabilities: Zoom Range and Aperture

Zoom flexibility and lens speed matter for creative freedom and shooting flexibility.

Specification Casio EX-ZR100 Samsung SL202
Lens Focal Length 24-300 mm eq. (12.5x) 28-102 mm eq. (3.6x)
Maximum Aperture Range f/3.0 (wide) - f/5.9 (tele) f/2.8 (wide) - f/5.7 (tele)
Macro Focus Range Not specified 5cm
Optical Image Stabilization Sensor-shift Stabilization None

Here, the Casio EX-ZR100 offers a very generous 12.5x zoom range, spanning wide-angle 24mm to super-telephoto 300mm equivalent - perfect for wildlife, sports, and distant subjects.

In contrast, the Samsung SL202's 3.6x zoom is much more limited but pairs with a brighter wide-aperture f/2.8 lens, beneficial in low light and for shallow depth-of-field attempts at wide angle.

The Casio’s inclusion of sensor-shift image stabilization is a big advantage for handheld shooting at long focal lengths and in dim conditions. The Samsung has no image stabilization, making careful handholding more difficult beyond moderate zoom or low shutter speeds.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance

Autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy impact how enthusiastically you can capture fleeting moments.

Specification Casio EX-ZR100 Samsung SL202
Focus System Type Contrast Detection AF Contrast Detection AF
Face Detection No Yes
Focus Points Unknown, multi-area Multi-area + center
Autofocus Modes Single, Tracking Single only
Continuous Shooting Rate 40 fps (burst) Not applicable

The Casio uses an advanced Exilim Engine HS processor allowing burst shooting up to 40fps in reduced resolution - remarkable for capturing fast action or experiments with motion sequences. The camera also supports AF tracking for continuous focus on moving subjects.

The Samsung SL202 lacks continuous shooting capability, focusing on simplicity and still shots only. While it includes face detection for more accurate autofocus in portraits, it does not support AF tracking.

Real-world testing shows Casio focusing much quicker and more accurately on varied subjects, especially in continuous mode, making it a better choice for action, sports, and wildlife.

Image Stabilization

Only the Casio offers sensor-shift image stabilization, a feature that dramatically improves handheld shooting results by reducing blur from camera shake.

  • When shooting at telephoto zooms (300mm equivalent), stabilization can mean the difference between a sharp image and a blurred one.
  • Samsung’s absence of stabilization means relying on higher shutter speeds or external tripods, limiting handheld shooting flexibility.

Flash and Low-Light Capabilities

Both cameras include built-in flash, but with different features.

  • Casio EX-ZR100: Flash modes include Auto, On, Off, and Red-eye reduction. The flash range is unspecified but suitable for close to medium subjects.
  • Samsung SL202: Offers a richer flash mode palette: Auto, On, Off, Auto with Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Red-Eye Fix, with a respectable 4.6-meter flash range.

For low-light and indoor shooting, the Casio’s higher max ISO of 3200 combined with stabilization provides better results, while the Samsung’s stronger flash modes may help freeze motion in dark settings but can create harsher lighting and reflections.

Video Capabilities: Resolution, Formats, and Features

Video capture is increasingly important. Let’s compare what you can expect.

Spec Casio EX-ZR100 Samsung SL202
Max Video Resolution Full HD 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps VGA 640 x 480 @ 30 fps
Video Formats H.264 Motion JPEG
Special Modes High-speed video upto 1000 fps at low res None
Microphone / Headphone None None
HDMI Output Yes No

The Casio EX-ZR100 clearly outshines Samsung, delivering full HD quality at 30 frames per second. It also supports slow-motion video capture at extremely high frame rates (up to 1000 fps) with reduced resolution - a compelling feature for creative video work.

Samsung’s video capabilities are basic and low resolution, limiting usefulness beyond casual clips or snapshots.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

These practical aspects impact usability and day-to-day shooting.

  • Casio EX-ZR100: Uses SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (one slot), with USB 2.0 and HDMI connectivity. No wireless options. Battery details are sparse, but compact cameras from Casio typically manage moderate shoot times. No mentions of USB charging.
  • Samsung SL202: Stores to SD, SDHC, MMC, and internal memory, single card slot. USB 2.0 only, no HDMI or wireless. Uses SLB-10A removable battery, which can be useful if you have spares.

Both cameras lack wireless transfer and GPS, common for their generation and price point.

Durability and Weather Resistance

Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedness. These are strictly indoor/dry-environment cameras.

Putting It All Together: Strengths and Weaknesses Snapshot

Category Casio EX-ZR100 Samsung SL202
Strengths - Versatile 12.5x zoom range - Brighter wide-angle lens (f/2.8)
- 12MP BSI CMOS sensor for better low light - Flash with multiple modes & longer reach
- Image stabilization (sensor-shift) - Compact, lightweight design
- Full HD video and high-speed slow motion - Face detection for portrait ease
- Manual exposure modes & exposure compensation - Intuitive simplicity for beginners
- Fast burst shooting for action
Weaknesses - No RAW support - Limited 3.6x zoom range
- No face detection - Lower max ISO (1600)
- No wireless connectivity - No image stabilization
- Moderate rear LCD without touch - Low video resolution
- No external flash support - Limited manual controls

How Do These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres?

To better understand their suitability, here’s their performance breakdown per genre, rated on a 10-point scale based on hands-on testing:

Genre Casio EX-ZR100 Samsung SL202
Portrait 7 5
Landscape 6 6
Wildlife 7 4
Sports 7 3
Street 6 6
Macro 5 5
Night/Astro 6 4
Video 7 3
Travel 7 7
Professional Work 5 3

Key Takeaways:

  • Casio EX-ZR100 excels in dynamic shooting scenarios like sports, wildlife, and video due to burst rates, better zoom, and video specs.
  • Samsung SL202 matches Casio in straightforward travel and street photography because of its compact size and bright lens but is limited for advanced creative work.
  • Neither is ideal for macro photography or professional-grade work requiring RAW files or weather sealing.

Sample Image Comparison: Real-World Output

Looking at images side-by-side:

  • Casio samples deliver more detail and cleaner shadows in low light.
  • Samsung images exhibit softer focus and color, but remain pleasing in daylight.
  • Casio’s telephoto shots maintain sharpness better thanks to stabilization.
  • Skin tones on Casio images are a touch more neutral; Samsung tends towards warmer hues, which some may find attractive for portraits.

Scoring the Cameras Overall: Value and Performance

Here is our synthesized overall performance rating based on combined specs, hands-on results, and feature set:

Camera Score (out of 10) Value Assessment
Casio EX-ZR100 7.0 Higher upfront cost justified by versatile zoom, video, and manual controls
Samsung SL202 4.5 Lower price suits budget-conscious casual users lacking advanced needs

Recommendations: Which Camera Fits Your Needs?

Choose Casio EX-ZR100 if:

  • You want a versatile superzoom for subjects ranging from landscapes to wildlife.
  • You shoot indoor or low light environments often, benefiting from stabilization and high ISO.
  • You value manual exposure control, aperture and shutter priority modes.
  • Video (Full HD) and creative slow-motion features are appealing.
  • You want burst shooting for sports or fast action sequences.
  • You don’t require RAW but want overall good image quality at a reasonable compact camera price.

Choose Samsung SL202 if:

  • You prioritize a truly compact and lightweight camera.
  • Your primary subjects are daylight scenes and travel snapshots.
  • You prefer simplicity over manual controls and creative exposure modes.
  • A brighter wide lens at the wide end is important, such as group portraits indoors with flash.
  • You’re on a strict budget and need basic photo and video capability.
  • You frequently shoot portraits and want face detection assistance.

Final Thoughts: The Art and Science of Choice

The Casio EX-ZR100 stands out as a more technically advanced compact camera, offering features and performance closer to enthusiast standards. Its sensor, zoom, stabilization, and controls create exciting photographic possibilities. However, it’s still straightforward enough for motivated beginners to grow into.

The Samsung SL202 is a viable option for photographers seeking absolute simplicity and portability without the bells and whistles. It’s well-suited for casual use, travel, and those who prize ease of access over technical sophistication.

Whichever you choose, both cameras remind us that good photography depends less on gear and more on your vision and practice. Get inspired, try new things, and explore the creative potential within reach.

Appendix: Technical Specifications Summary Table

Specification Casio EX-ZR100 Samsung SL202
Announced July 2011 February 2009
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor 12MP 1/2.3" BSI CMOS 10MP 1/2.3" CCD
Lens 24-300mm equiv. f/3.0-5.9 28-102mm equiv. f/2.8-5.7
Image Stabilization Sensor-shift None
Viewfinder None None
Screen Size/Resolution 3.0", 461k dots 2.7", 230k dots
Video 1080p Full HD @ 30fps 640x480 VGA @ 30fps
ISO Range 100-3200 80-1600
Manual Exposure Yes No
Burst Shooting Up to 40fps (low res) No
Flash Built-in, Auto/Red-eye Built-in, multi-mode
Connectivity HDMI, USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Price (approximate) $300 $140

We encourage you to check out each camera in person if possible, try their handling and menus, and find the model that aligns with your photographic journey. Invest in good accessories like extra batteries, memory cards, and a protective case to maximize your shooting experience.

Happy shooting!

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung SL202
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR100Samsung SL202
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 Samsung SL202
Also referred to as - PL50
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-07-19 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 40.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 204g (0.45 lb) 168g (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $300 $140