Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung SL202, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR100 was released 2 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR100 matches up vs the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-ZR100 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-ZR100
| SL202 | EX-ZR100 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung SL202
| EX-ZR100 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR100 versus Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR100 compared to the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The visual here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR100 and SL202.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR100 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR100 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 204g (0.45 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $140 |