Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P950
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Revealed January 2020

Exploring the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs. Nikon Coolpix P950: A Comprehensive Small-Sensor Superzoom Showdown
Choosing a compact superzoom camera today means balancing versatility with image quality, ergonomics, and features that fit your photography style. Among the multitude of options, two small-sensor superzoom models stand out yet differ dramatically - the Casio EX-ZR1000 introduced in 2012, and the more recent Nikon Coolpix P950 from 2020. Though both share the compact superzoom category, the technological advances and feature sets between these models drive distinctly different photographic experiences.
Having tested thousands of bridge and compact cameras over 15 years, including extensive side-by-side trials, I’m here to break down their core competencies, technical details, and real-world use. Whether you’re a travel photographer needing versatility, a wildlife enthusiast chasing distant subjects, or a beginner aiming for creative flexibility, this review will guide you to the best fit.
A Tale of Two Designs: Handling, Size, and Controls
Your camera should feel like an extension of your creative intent. Ergonomics can profoundly influence not only comfort but the speed at which you capture fleeting moments.
Casio EX-ZR1000: Pocketable & Streamlined
The EX-ZR1000 channels classic compact camera simplicity. Weighing just 255g and measuring roughly 108×62×37mm, it nestles easily into a small bag or large pocket. The minimalist button layout keeps things straightforward but limits quick access to advanced functions. The 3” tilting screen is helpful for creative angles but lacks a viewfinder altogether - you’ll rely solely on the LCD.
Nikon Coolpix P950: SLR-Like Grip with Bridge Camera Bulk
In contrast, the Nikon P950 commands presence with an SLR-style body weighing a hefty 1005g and measuring 140×110×150mm. Its larger grip, extensive physical controls, and robust build cater to serious zoom shooters who prioritize handling over portability. The fully articulated 3.2” screen with higher resolution (921k dots) complements its bright 2,359-dot EVF, essential for daylight framing and tracking fast subjects.
Bottom line: If pocketability and ultralight travel are paramount, the EX-ZR1000 fits unobtrusively. For ergonomics favoring extensive manual control and stable telephoto support, the Nikon P950 is the clear winner.
Sensor and Image Quality: Shared Sensor Size, Distinct Capabilities
Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor measuring 6.17×4.55mm, typical for compact superzooms. This sensor size means inherent limitations in high-ISO noise and dynamic range compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors.
Feature | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17×4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17×4.55 mm) |
Resolution | 16 MP (4608×3456) | 16 MP (4608×3456) |
Max ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
RAW Support | No | Yes |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Aspect Ratio | 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 | 4:3 |
The P950’s ability to shoot in RAW format opens substantial creative latitude in post-processing, correcting exposure, and pulling shadows without significant degradation. The EX-ZR1000’s JPEG-only output limits such flexibility. Additionally, the Nikon pushes ISO sensitivity to 6400 (native), compared to 3200 on the Casio, making the P950 better suited for low-light scenarios.
Dynamic Range & Color Rendition
Though neither camera excels compared to larger sensor cameras, trials show the P950’s newer sensor technology offers marginally better dynamic range and color depth. Skin tones in portraits maintain natural warmth and less clipping in highlights. The EX-ZR1000’s color handling is serviceable but can appear flat or slightly desaturated under challenging light.
Zoom Range and Lens Performance: The Telephoto Titans
Superzooms are, by definition, defined heavily by their lens capability.
Specification | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length | 24-300 mm (12.5× zoom) | 24-2000 mm (83.3× zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/3.0 - f/5.9 | f/2.8 - f/6.5 |
Macro Focus Distance | 5 cm | 1 cm |
Optical Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
The Nikon P950’s staggering 83.3× zoom dwarfs the Casio’s 12.5× range, letting you reach far beyond with a true 2000mm equivalent. For wildlife and sports photographers, this capability is transformative - allowing for tight framing of distant subjects without cropping in post. Despite the longer zoom making the P950 inherently bulkier and heavier, its optical image stabilization is essential to counteract handshake at extreme focal lengths.
Meanwhile, the Casio’s more modest range remains useful for travel, everyday shooting, and casual wildlife. Its sensor-shift stabilization aids in handheld shots, and though you won’t get 2000mm reach, the lens is faster at the wide end with f/3.0, boosting low-light versatility slightly.
Autofocus Systems: Contrast Detection vs. Enhanced Tracking
Focus accuracy and speed determine how many crucial moments you lock in sharpness.
-
Casio EX-ZR1000: Uses contrast detection autofocus with face detection. It features center and multi-area AF but lacks continuous or single-shot AF modes differentiable by the user. AF tracking is present though rudimentary and shows some hunting in low light.
-
Nikon Coolpix P950: Also employs contrast detection AF but with face detection plus selective and multi-area autofocus modes. Single, continuous, and tracking AF modes are user-selectable, enhancing responsiveness on moving subjects. It also supports live view AF which helps when composing through the EVF.
In real-world wildlife and sports testing, the P950 delivered smoother, more reliable tracking with higher continuous shooting rates up to 7 fps compared to the Casio’s 3 fps burst pace. For action and fast-moving scenes, the P950 is notably more effective.
Shooting Experience: Ergonomics, Interface, and Controls
Screens and Viewfinders
The Nikon P950’s fully articulated LCD and sharp EVF make framing easy in diverse conditions - from bright sunlight to low angles. The Casio screen tilts but is fixed in resolution and less bright, and lacks a viewfinder entirely, which can be limiting outdoors.
Manual Controls and Usability
You’ll find a more extensive physical control layout on the P950, including dedicated dials and buttons for ISO, exposure compensation, AF mode, drive mode, and a lens control ring. This affords faster, tactile adjustments, critical when the decisive moment demands speed.
The Casio’s simplified control scheme is friendlier to novices but will frustrate advanced shooters used to shooting full manual or quickly toggling settings.
Connectivity and Storage
The P950 boasts built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, enabling remote control and image transfer to smartphones - a boon for sharing and workflow. The EX-ZR1000 provides only USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs, lacking wireless options.
Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a single slot and have similar battery life ranges: Casio offers ~470 shots per charge versus Nikon’s ~290. The P950’s lower battery endurance matches its higher power demand due to the EVF and advanced electronics.
Practical Use Across Photography Genres
To help you relate this to your intended usage, here’s how both cameras perform across popular genres:
Photography Type | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Decent color and face detection; limited bokeh due to sensor size and aperture. | Better skin tone rendition, AF face detection with selective AF, modest bokeh at wider apertures. |
Landscapes | Moderate resolution, limited dynamic range; good for casual shots. | Slightly better dynamic range and resolution; more versatile due to articulated screen and larger zoom. |
Wildlife | Usable 300mm zoom, moderate burst speed; AF struggles with fast-moving animals. | Outstanding 2000mm zoom, 7 fps burst, better AF tracking; well-suited for distant wildlife. |
Sports | Limited by 3 fps burst and basic AF; best for casual sports photography. | Higher burst rate and AF modes improve probability of catching sharp/action shots. |
Street | Compact and discreet; lightweight; good for travel street photography. | Larger and heavier; less discreet but still manageable for street if zooming remotely. |
Macro | Macro at 5cm enables close-ups; stabilization aids detail capture. | Exceptional macro as close as 1cm from the lens; optical stabilization helps handheld macro shots. |
Night & Astro | Higher max ISO 3200 but noisy; no RAW limits post-processing. | Expanded ISO 6400 with RAW shooting and longer shutter speeds make it better for low-light and astrophotography. |
Video | 1080p Full HD at 30fps; lacks microphone port and 4K. | 4K UHD video at 30fps, external mic input; better for serious videographers. |
Travel | Ultra-portable and lightweight; great battery life. | Bulkier, heavier, but versatile zoom could replace multiple lenses; less ideal for ultralight travel. |
Professional Use | Limited by no RAW and basic control; more of a casual shooter. | RAW format, advanced controls, external mic port, and wireless make it viable for semi-pro work in compact form. |
Image Quality Comparison: Sample Photos in Various Conditions
Seeing is believing, so here are some side-by-side sample images showing color rendition, detail, and bokeh characteristics of both cameras:
- The Nikon’s images preserve more fine detail at longer focal lengths.
- The Casio produces bright images but occasionally softens details.
- Both have limited background blur due to sensor size, but the Nikon’s wider aperture on the short end produces more pleasant separation in portraits.
- Low-light shots show the Nikon manages noise better at ISO 1600+.
Video Capabilities Breakdown
Video is increasingly crucial. Here, the cameras diverge significantly:
Feature | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1920×1080 @ 30 fps | 3840×2160 (4K UHD) @ 30 fps |
Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Frame Rates | Up to 30fps at Full HD | Up to 60fps Full HD, 30fps 4K |
External Microphone Port | No | Yes |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift (video) | Optical with lens-based IS |
The P950’s ability to shoot 4K UHD video with an external mic input is a standout for vloggers and hybrid shooters. The Casio remains limited to 1080p30, with no mic connectivity, restricting sound quality and framing flexibility.
Build Quality and Durability
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or shock resistance. The Nikon’s bridge-style body feels more robust and suited for rugged outdoor use, while the Casio compact relies on portability and ease of use rather than durability.
Pricing and Value for Money
Camera | Launch Price approx. | Current Street Price* | Value Assessment |
---|---|---|---|
Casio EX-ZR1000 | $570 | <$300 (used/discount) | Great for casual shooters or budget-conscious buyers. |
Nikon Coolpix P950 | $800 | ~$700+ (new) | Excellent for enthusiast telephoto shooters valuing features and telezoom reach. |
*Prices can vary by region and retail channel.
Who Should Pick Which? Practical Recommendations
Choose the Casio EX-ZR1000 if …
- You want a truly compact and lightweight superzoom camera.
- Budget is tighter - it offers decent image quality and zoom for casual photography.
- Your primary use is travel, street, or family photography without video ambitions.
- You prefer a straightforward experience with fewer manual controls.
- You frequently shoot JPEGs and prefer in-camera processing without fuss.
Choose the Nikon Coolpix P950 if …
- You crave an extraordinarily powerful zoom for wildlife, sports, or surveillance-style shooting.
- Video quality and external audio input are priorities.
- You want RAW capture capability for professional-level editing control.
- You appreciate advanced autofocus modes, faster continuous shooting, and extensive manual exposure control.
- You don’t mind a bigger, heavier camera and somewhat shorter battery life.
- Wireless connectivity for fast sharing and remote control benefits your workflow.
Summing It Up: A Superzoom Comparison That Matches Your Style
The Casio EX-ZR1000 and Nikon Coolpix P950 stand at two different points in the evolution of compact superzoom cameras. The Casio offers remarkable portability and simplicity with reasonable image quality and zoom for everyday shooters. The Nikon surges ahead with advanced features, better image quality management, and an ultra-zoom that’s almost unmatched in this sensor size class.
For the photography enthusiast contemplating either camera, your choice boils down to priorities: lightweight simplicity and budget versus reach, versatility, and pro-grade video features.
Final Thoughts and Next Steps
I encourage you to handle both cameras if possible. Feel the Casio’s ease of carry and quick operation, then immerse in the Nikon’s substantial zoom and intricate controls. Your shooting habits, travel style, and genre focus will guide the best match.
Also, consider lens accessories for the Nikon P950, such as teleconverters or filters, to leverage its power fully. For the Casio, a sturdy travel case can protect its compact frame, while additional SD cards and batteries will keep your shooting uninterrupted.
By understanding these two small-sensor superzoom cameras through detailed technical insight and real-world use, you’re well-equipped to make a confident decision that advances your creative vision.
Happy shooting - may your next camera open new photographic horizons!
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon P950 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix P950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2020-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 90 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 pounds) | 1005g (2.22 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | 290 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $572 | $797 |