Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aa98/9aa982410c7510bfbc83a3262c181859101131e1" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-ZR1000 was revealed 16 months earlier than the WG-4 GPS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR1000 scores vs the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR1000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-ZR1000
WG-4 GPS | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | September 2012 | More modern by 16 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR1000 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 offers outer dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 versus the WG-4 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a078a/a078acbc9946601ffa68abe9407fd6c4dd04c2f5" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WG-4 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4de86/4de864d103bf110149ef51de9a4f71f59431c138" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The image here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and WG-4 GPS.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you should expect similar quality of pictures although you might want to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42723/42723f17e6cf469733d5fad98808694cd780bcb7" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45633/45633d21a3ed5aea858fc51f28ae2353ff5551e0" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 235g (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 240 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $572 | $210 |