Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST65
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung ST65, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR1000 was manufactured 21 months after the ST65 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up versus the ST65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung ST65
| EX-ZR1000 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 21 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| ST65 | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung ST65
| EX-ZR1000 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has outer measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the ST65.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and ST65 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and ST65.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR1000 to offer you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR1000 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $572 | $130 |
