Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Launched January 2014
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 15 months prior to the WB2200F making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up vs the WB2200F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Samsung WB2200F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-ZR1000 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-ZR1000
WB2200F | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | September 2012 | More modern by 15 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-ZR1000 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 provides external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the WB2200F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WB2200F is 90 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The image underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and WB2200F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of files however you have to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB2200F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-09-25 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lbs) | 708g (1.56 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $572 | $599 |