Clicky

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
  • Released September 2012
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Launched January 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

Following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZR1000 was brought out 15 months prior to the WB2200F making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up vs the WB2200F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung WB2200F

		

		

			
 EX-ZR1000 WB2200F 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution461k460kCrisper display (+1k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-ZR1000

		

		

			
 WB2200F EX-ZR1000 
LaunchedJanuary 2014September 2012More modern by 15 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB2200F

		

		

			
 EX-ZR1000 WB2200F 
Focus manually  More precise focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen  Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display  Neither provides Touch display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 provides external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the WB2200F.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and WB2200F is 90 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
More often than not, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The image underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and WB2200F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of files however you have to factor the age  of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
	
			Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Portrait photography with Samsung WB2200F
44
 focusing manually
 decent MP (16MP)
 includes face detection focus
 external flash not possible
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
44
 has manual focus
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 comes with face detection focus
 no external flash support
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Street photography camera
 Samsung WB2200F as a Street photography camera
68
 has a tilting screen
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors in class (255g)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
40
 image stabilization (Optical)
 screen is fixed
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
 more heavy than competition (708 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Sports photography with Samsung WB2200F
51
 great zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent MP (16MP)
 includes tracking autofocus
 good battery pack (470 CIPA)
 slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
53
 incredible zoom range (20-1200mm  60.0 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Travel photography with Samsung WB2200F
70
 good battery pack (470 CIPA)
 lighter than competitors in class (255 grams)
 decent MP (16MP)
 flash built-in
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 very long zoom (300mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse function
 does not contain selfie friendly screen
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
51
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (20mm)
 great zoom (1200mm)
 lack of Timelapse mode
 more heavy than competition (708 grams)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography factors
52
 focusing manually
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent MP (16MP)
 good battery pack (470 CIPA)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 doesn't have Timelapse function
46
 has manual focus
 pretty wide (20mm)
 decent sized screen (3")
 image stabilization (Optical)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
 lack of Timelapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Vlogging Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Vlogging camera
 Samsung WB2200F as a Vlogging camera
34
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detection focus
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than competitors in class (255g)
 slow max aperture (f3.0)
 does not contain selfie friendly screen
 doesn't have external microphone jack
25
 pretty wide (20mm)
 image stabilization (Optical)
 comes with face detection focus
 great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 lack of external microphone socket
 more heavy than competition (708 grams)
Photography Glossary
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB2200F
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000Samsung WB2200F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 Samsung WB2200F
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2012-09-25 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 5cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 461k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dots
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 1/8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 255g (0.56 lbs) 708g (1.56 lbs)
Dimensions 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 BP-1410
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) -
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SCXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $572 $599