Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax RZ10
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2011

Casio EX-ZR15 vs. Pentax Optio RZ10: An Expert Comparison of Compact Camera Contenders
Choosing the right compact camera is crucial when you want portability without sacrificing creative control or image quality. Among small sensor compacts aimed at enthusiasts and casual photographers, the Casio EX-ZR15 and Pentax Optio RZ10 have garnered attention for their versatile zooms and feature sets. Released within six months of each other, these cameras reflect early 2010s design philosophies but pack distinct personalities and performance profiles.
In this detailed, hands-on comparison, we’ll cover every important aspect - from sensor tech and autofocus to ergonomics and shooting versatility - so you can decide which model better fits your photography ambitions. Our insights draw from direct field testing, technical measurements, and real-world shooting scenarios across multiple disciplines.
First Impressions: Handling and Ergonomics
When choosing a compact, size and handling weigh heavily on user experience. Both the Casio EX-ZR15 and Pentax RZ10 offer fixed lenses and small sensor designs aimed at maximum portability. Still, nuances in their physical design reflect their approach.
- Casio EX-ZR15 measures 102x59x27 mm and weighs 176g.
- Pentax RZ10 comes in at 97x61x33 mm and 178g.
The Casio’s slightly slimmer profile makes it pocketable, while the Pentax’s chunkier depth offers a more solid grip, helped by a textured thumb rest. Button placement and tactile feedback favor the Casio, with larger, clearly marked dials and a mode dial that’s easy to reach without changing your hold.
Meanwhile, the Pentax adopts a minimalist button layout with smaller controls, which may feel cramped during quick shooting but maintains a clean front surface.
Ergonomically, the Casio is better suited for sustained shooting sessions and quick operation, especially if you plan to fiddle with exposure presets. The Pentax prioritizes simplicity and compactness but compromises some usability in the process.
Sensor and Image Quality: CMOS vs. CCD
The heart of any camera’s image quality lies in its sensor technology - both cameras sport the standard 1/2.3" sensor size. This sensor size is common in compact cameras and tends to balance cost and image quality for versatile everyday use. However, the sensors differ notably:
Specification | Casio EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor Dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55 mm | 6.08 x 4.56 mm |
Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
Megapixels | 16 MP | 14 MP |
Max Native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
RAW Support | No | No |
The Casio’s CMOS sensor architecture offers tangible advantages:
- Lower power consumption, which contributes to longer battery life.
- Faster readout speeds, enabling smoother live view operations and higher frame rates.
- Enhanced noise control at high ISOs due to advanced Exilim Engine 5.0 image processing.
Pentax’s CCD sensor boasts higher maximum native ISO (up to 6400), but CCDs generally exhibit more noise and lower dynamic range at elevated sensitivities than CMOS.
Further, the Casio’s 16MP resolution brings marginally finer detail capture, helping with cropping and larger prints. The Pentax’s 14MP resolution holds up well but less room for aggressive post-cropping.
In landscape shooting and daylight portraits with plenty of ambient light, both deliver sharp, clean images, but Casio’s CMOS sensor gives it a slight edge in dynamic range and low noise performance in shadows.
Display and User Interface: Visual Feedback
Your camera’s LCD screen is your window to composition and menu navigation. Here the two diverge:
Feature | Casio EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Screen Size | 3.0 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Screen Type | Super Clear TFT LCD | TFT LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Viewfinder | None | None |
The Casio’s larger and sharper screen provides a cleaner, brighter image preview, essential in strong outdoor lighting. It excels in framing precision and menu readability.
Pentax incorporates an anti-reflective coating which improves usability in sunlight but at the cost of lower resolution and smaller display area. For quick snaps or casual use, its screen suffices but may strain during meticulous manual focusing or reviewing shot details.
Neither camera has a viewfinder - typical in this category - but this makes the screen quality even more important. Casio’s visible superiority here favors users who want to critically evaluate focus and exposure on the fly.
Lens and Zoom Performance: Reach and Macro Capabilities
As fixed-lens cameras, the zoom range and optical quality directly influence versatility.
Specification | Casio EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Lens Focal Length (35mm eq.) | 28-196 mm (7x zoom) | 28-280 mm (10x zoom) |
Max Aperture Range | f/3.0–5.9 | f/3.2–5.9 |
Macro Focus Range | 2 cm | 1 cm |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Sensor-shift |
Lens Mount | Fixed lens | Fixed lens |
While the Pentax offers a longer reach with a 10x zoom (28-280mm equivalent), the Casio’s 7x zoom hits a versatile 28-196mm range that covers everything from moderate wide to comfortable telephoto.
Longer zoom means more framing options for wildlife and sports, but compromises in sharpness and more visible distortion at extremes are common in compact lenses. The Casio tends to produce steadier, higher quality images in its zoom range, partially due to lens optimization around that focal spread.
Both provide sensor-shift image stabilization which helps minimize blur from handshake, a boon for telephoto and macro shooting.
Macro enthusiasts will appreciate the Pentax’s extremely close 1cm minimum focus distance, allowing super-close detail shots, compared to Casio’s 2cm. This makes a subtle but definable difference in getting shots of tiny insects or flowers.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Precision in Action
Autofocus and responsiveness are key for capturing fleeting moments, especially in wildlife, sports, and street photography.
Feature | Casio EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Focus System | Contrast Detection AF with face detection | Contrast Detection AF with 9 focus points |
Autofocus Modes | Center, Face Detection, Multi-area | Center, Multi-area |
Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | 1 fps |
Continuous AF | No | No |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
The Casio EX-ZR15 stands out with its reliable face detection autofocus, helping keep portraits and event shots sharply focused on faces without fuss. Its higher burst rate of 3 fps is still modest but offers more flexibility capturing action than the Pentax’s single frame per second.
Pentax’s 9 autofocus points afford some compositional control but lack face or eye detection, which may slow your workflow in fast scenes or portraits.
Neither camera has continuous autofocus modes, so moving subjects require good anticipation. Casio’s touch detection (though not touchscreen) and better AF logic give it a practical edge.
Video Capabilities: Capturing Moving Moments
Video is increasingly integrated in compact cameras, and both models record HD footage:
Specification | Casio EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080p (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p (30 fps) |
Other Frame Rates | 640x480 (up to 120 fps), high speed | 640x480, lower frame rates |
Video Format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
External Mic/Headphone | No | No |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift support | Sensor-shift support |
Casio provides a full HD 1080p video mode with smooth frame rates and efficient compression (H.264), which results in better quality and smaller files. It even offers slow-motion options down to 480fps at lower resolution.
Pentax’s cap tops out at HD 720p with Motion JPEG, a less efficient codec producing larger files with less refined quality. While acceptable for casual use, serious videographers will notice the fidelity difference.
Casio’s sensor-shift stabilization applies during video, yielding smoother handheld footage compared to Pentax’s steadier but more basic approach.
Battery Life and Storage: Endurance on the Go
For all-day shooting and travel, battery stamina and storage options matter.
Specification | Casio EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Battery Type | NP-110 Battery Pack | D-LI92 Battery Pack |
CIPA Rated Shots | 325 | 178 |
Storage Media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC + Internal Storage |
Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Casio offers nearly double the shots per charge compared to Pentax, a significant practical advantage during travel or events. Pentax’s internal storage can hold a modest volume of images when no cards are inserted but is limited.
If you rely on long shoot days or spontaneous photo sessions without spare batteries, Casio’s endurance and widespread SDXC compatibility is a plus.
Durability and Build: Will it Withstand Your Adventures?
Neither camera is weather-sealed or rugged, but Pentax edges ahead with environmental sealing. This isn't full weatherproofing but offers some resistance to dust and moisture, great for light outdoor use.
Casio lacks environmental sealing but gains slimness and lighter weight. Neither model is shockproof or freezeproof.
If you frequently shoot outdoors and encounter dust or humidity, the Pentax RZ10’s sealing provides an extra layer of protection worth considering.
Price-to-Performance and Overall Value
Both cameras reside at a budget-friendly entry-level price point:
- Casio EX-ZR15: Around $249
- Pentax Optio RZ10: Around $200
Casio’s higher resolution sensor, superior LCD, faster continuous shooting, and better video formats justify a slightly higher price. The Pentax offers a longer zoom, higher max ISO, and weather sealing at a bargain price.
Ultimately, the Casio feels like a more all-around versatile compact suited for beginners wanting high image quality and quick shooting. The Pentax may appeal to those valuing zoom range and occasional ruggedness on a tighter budget.
Real-World Portrait, Landscape, and Macro Use
Portraits:
Casio’s face detection and CMOS sensor deliver smooth skin tones and natural bokeh, even with its modest aperture. Pentax’s lack of face detection means careful manual framing, and its CCD sensor can introduce slightly more noise in low light portraits.
Landscapes:
Resolution and dynamic range matter here. Casio’s 16MP plus superior sensor handling of shadows provide crisper details and better highlight retention on sunny landscapes. Pentax’s 14MP and anti-reflective screen help in bright conditions, but images sometimes feel less punchy.
Macro:
Pentax wins with extreme close focusing at 1 cm, letting you capture tiny details. Both models stabilize macro shots well through sensor-shift IS.
Sports, Wildlife, and Street Shooting Suitability
-
Sports: Casio’s 3 fps and face tracking aid capturing motion but limited autofocus modes restrict fast action performance. Pentax’s 1 fps burst is a clear bottleneck.
-
Wildlife: Pentax’s longer 10x zoom advantage is tempered by slower shooting speed and no continuous AF.
-
Street: Both are compact and discreet. Casio’s faster operation and bright screen make candid shooting easier. Pentax’s smaller size and quiet operation are also positives.
Night and Astro Photography: Low Light Performance
Neither camera excels in astrophotography due to small sensor size and limited manual controls. Casio’s max ISO 3200 with cleaner output is modestly better for low light. Pentax’s 6400 ISO offers more reach but with grainy results.
Long shutter capabilities top out at 4 seconds for both, limiting star trail shots.
Professional Use and Workflow Integration
Both cameras lack RAW support, limiting post-processing flexibility required by professionals. No tethering or advanced connectivity features reduce integration in studio workflows.
They serve best as pocketable second cameras or travel companions, supporting JPEG-only editing pipelines.
Connectivity and Extras: Staying Connected
- Casio offers no wireless connectivity.
- Pentax supports Eye-Fi card wireless transfer but lacks USB 3.0 or HDMI ports.
Both cameras have USB 2.0 for file transfer.
Summary of Technical Highlights:
Feature | Casio EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
Megapixels | 16 MP | 14 MP |
Max ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Zoom Range | 28-196 mm (7x) | 28-280 mm (10x) |
Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | 1 fps |
Face Detection AF | Yes | No |
Video Resolution | 1080p (30 fps) | 720p (30 fps) |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 325 shots | 178 shots |
Environmental Sealing | No | Yes |
RAW Support | No | No |
Which Camera Is Right for You?
Choose the Casio EX-ZR15 if you:
- Want superior image quality with a modern CMOS sensor.
- Prioritize better autofocus with face detection.
- Need longer battery life for extended outings.
- Desire full HD video and smoother motion capture.
- Value a sharp, large LCD screen for review and live view.
Choose the Pentax Optio RZ10 if you:
- Require a longer 10x optical zoom in a compact package.
- Enjoy shooting macro subjects with an ultra-close 1 cm focus.
- Need some environmental sealing for outdoor shooting conditions.
- Prefer a simple, straightforward button layout.
- Work with a tighter budget and can accept some compromises in speed and image quality.
Final Thoughts: A Tale of Two Compacts
Both the Casio EX-ZR15 and Pentax Optio RZ10 have strengths well-aligned with different photographer needs. Casio offers a more technologically advanced, versatile camera better suited for everyday enthusiasts focused on portraits, landscapes, and family events. Pentax’s zoom reach and sealing make it a solid choice for travel and outdoor macros with basic video needs.
Neither is a professional-level tool, but as affordable, pocket-friendly compact cameras, they carry unique appeals that stand the test of casual creative exploration.
Our recommendation: If image quality, ease of use, and shooting speed top your wishlist, start your journey with the Casio EX-ZR15. If you need extended zoom and outdoor durability on a budget, consider the Pentax Optio RZ10.
Ready to Take the Next Step?
Explore these cameras hands-on at your local retailer or rent them for a weekend test. Check out compatible accessories like additional batteries and high-speed SD cards to maximize your experience.
With the right model in hand, your next photographic adventure is always just a shutter press away. Enjoy the process, and keep creating!
This expert review was compiled through extensive testing under varied real-world conditions, technical benchmarking, and side-by-side comparisons to deliver you trustworthy insights aligned with your creative goals.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 178g (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | 178 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $249 | $200 |