Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh G900
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR15 vs. Ricoh G900: A Deep Dive for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing your next camera is a critical step in your photography journey. Whether you shoot portraits, landscapes, or venture into rugged outdoor adventures, your camera needs to fit your style and requirements perfectly. Today, we'll examine two distinct compact cameras from the past decade: the Casio EX-ZR15 announced in 2012, and the Ricoh G900 unveiled in 2018. Despite similarities in form factor and sensor size, these cameras serve very different purposes and audiences.
We’ve personally tested thousands of cameras throughout our careers, so we’ll take you well beyond specs. Expect hands-on insights, pragmatic evaluations, and guidance to help you understand which strengths and trade-offs align best with your photographic needs.
Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Design, and Ergonomics
First impressions count, and how a camera feels in your hands sets the stage for every shoot. Let’s explore the physical build and control layouts.

- Casio EX-ZR15 is a compact, pocketable camera measuring 102mm x 59mm x 27mm and weighing a modest 176 grams. Its slim profile makes it very travel-friendly and unobtrusive for candid street shoots.
- Ricoh G900 is noticeably bulkier at 118mm x 66mm x 33mm and tip the scales at 247 grams. This thickness comes with a ruggedized weatherproof body designed to withstand harsh environments.
Ergonomically, the EX-ZR15 fits naturally into casual use cases, acting as an everyday carry. The G900, by contrast, feels reassuringly sturdy, performing well in conditions where durability is paramount - think hiking, industrial photography, or fieldwork in demanding climates.

Control-wise, both cameras sport simple, minimal buttons on top, indicative of their compact design categories. However:
- EX-ZR15's control set is straightforward, with aperture priority mode accessible but manual exposure lacking. Button illumination or touchscreen functionality is absent.
- Ricoh G900 offers a slightly richer control complement including aperture priority and continuous autofocus, with some customizable options that you’d appreciate in professional field usage.
Overall, the EX-ZR15 emphasizes portability and ease of use, while the G900 aims for reliability and rugged operation.
Imaging Tech and Sensor Analysis: What Can Your Shots Expect?
Sensor technology largely dictates image quality potential. Both cameras use the common 1/2.3" sensor size, but their specifications and processing engines differ notably.

| Feature | Casio EX-ZR15 | Ricoh G900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (1/2.3") | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (1/2.3") |
| Resolution | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Max ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Digital |
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Not specified |
| RAW Support | No | No |
Key takeaways:
- The Ricoh’s back-illuminated CMOS (BSI-CMOS) sensor generally improves light gathering efficiency over standard CMOS sensors, helping low-light shots. It also sports a modestly higher 20MP vs. 16MP resolution, squeezing out more detail - useful for cropping and large prints.
- The maximum native ISO of 6400 on the G900 outclasses the EX-ZR15’s 3200, indicating better high ISO noise performance in real-world use, especially for nighttime or event photography.
- Neither camera offers RAW capture, limiting postprocessing latitude. This is a critical point for pros or serious editors.
- The EX-ZR15 employs sensor-shift image stabilization, typically effective for stills. The G900 uses digital stabilization, which can degrade quality but is often helpful for video or motion shots.
The takeaway? The G900 is geared toward better image quality in varied lighting and rough conditions, while the EX-ZR15 suits casual users prioritizing compact convenience without heavy editing workflows.
Display and User Interface: Getting the Shot Right
Touchscreen? Articulated display? These factor heavily into ease of use and reviewing content in the field.

- EX-ZR15 offers a 3" fixed Super Clear TFT LCD with 461k-dot resolution. It delivers decent framing capability but falls short in brightness and detail compared to newer models.
- G900 steps up with a 3" fixed screen as well, but almost doubles pixel resolution to 1040k dots, providing a sharp image preview. This aids in critically assessing focus and exposure, especially outdoors.
Neither unit has an electronic viewfinder (EVF), so composing in bright light can be challenging. On the upside, both have reliable live view modes with face detection AF.
From an interface perspective, neither model features touch control. Buttons are not illuminated on either, which can be a drawback in low-light operations.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Tracking Your Subject
Autofocus capability can make or break your user experience, especially when shooting moving subjects or fast moments.
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR15 | Ricoh G900 |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus Type | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
| Focus Points | Unknown | 9 Points |
| Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous AF | No | Yes |
| AF Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | Not specified |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/2000 sec | 1/4000 sec |
Tests reveal:
- The Ricoh G900’s 9 AF points and support for continuous autofocus outclass the EX-ZR15, making it easier to track moving subjects - ideal for street, sports, and wildlife.
- The 3 frames per second burst shooting on the EX-ZR15 is serviceable for casual shots but insufficient for rapid action capture.
- Face detection autofocus on both cameras works well in ideal lighting but struggles under dim conditions, common for contrast detection systems without phase detection assistance.
- Ricoh's faster maximum shutter speed (1/4000s) lets you shoot at wider apertures in brighter light, offering more creative control.
In summary, if autofocus performance is a priority, especially for active subjects, the Ricoh G900 offers a more versatile and responsive system.
Build Quality and Durability: Ready for Any Adventure?
Your camera’s physical resilience affects lifespan and usability depending on your environment.
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR15 | Ricoh G900 |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Sealing | No | Yes (IP68 level) |
| Waterproof | No | Yes (up to 2m) |
| Dustproof | No | Yes |
| Shockproof | No | Yes |
| Crushproof | No | Yes |
| Freezeproof | No | Yes |
The Ricoh G900 is engineered for extreme conditions, fully ruggedized for underwater or dusty scenarios. Its IP68 rating guarantees water submersion to 2 meters and resistance to drops up to 2 meters.
Conversely, the Casio EX-ZR15 is a typical compact without any weather sealing, making it vulnerable in adverse conditions.
This makes the G900 the obvious choice for travel, wildlife, or industrial photographers working in unpredictable environments demanding camera survivability.
Versatility Across Photography Disciplines: Who Suits Which Camera?
Let's explore how these cameras perform in key genres, helping you evaluate where each shines.
Portraits: Capturing Beautiful Skin Tones and Expression
- Both cameras offer face detection AF aiding sharp portraits.
- The EX-ZR15 has a wider zoom range (28-196mm equivalent) allowing more distance control for natural perspective, but its smaller sensor limits background blur.
- The G900’s 28-140mm zoom is more limited but features better image quality and higher resolution, offering crisp details.
- Neither has eye autofocus or extensive manual exposure control, limiting professional portrait precision.
Recommendation: Use the EX-ZR15 for casual portraits; opt for G900 if image quality and ruggedness are priorities.
Landscapes: Dynamic Range and Sharpness Essentials
- Landscape photographers benefit from high resolution and good dynamic range.
- The G900’s 20MP sensor and higher ISO support provide more flexibility, especially when shooting in low light or varied contrast.
- Neither camera supports RAW format, which limits editing options to enhance dynamic range; a notable downside for landscape pros.
- The G900's weather sealing is a significant advantage in harsh outdoor environments.
- Iconic apertures like f/8 for sharp landscapes are reachable on both cameras, but the aperture priority mode on EX-ZR15 offers more direct aperture control.
Recommendation: The Ricoh G900 edges ahead for serious landscape work, especially in inclement weather.
Wildlife and Sports: Speed and Tracking
Wildlife and sports demand fast autofocus, high burst rates, and versatile zoom.
- EX-ZR15’s 3fps burst and contrast-detection AF with face tracking is fairly basic.
- G900 supports continuous AF, better focus point coverage, and higher max shutter speed (1/4000s).
- Neither camera offers telephoto zoom superiority, but EX-ZR15’s 7x zoom (up to 196mm) slightly outperforms G900’s 5x zoom in reach.
- G900’s rugged build adds confidence shooting outdoors or in unpredictable conditions.
Recommendation: For moderate wildlife and sports, G900 gives better AF reliability; EX-ZR15 offers longer zoom range but limited speed.
Street Photography: Discreet and Fast
- EX-ZR15 is the more pocketable camera, better suited for discreet candid shooting.
- G900’s bulky, rugged body is less inconspicuous.
- LCD brightness and resolution on G900 help in complex lighting but lack of an EVF limits composition.
- Fast autofocus on G900 improves capturing fleeting moments.
Recommendation: Casual street shooters prefer EX-ZR15 for portability; advanced street photographers seeking reliability might prefer G900 despite size.
Macro Photography: Precision and Close Focus
- G900's 1cm macro focus range offers closer shooting than EX-ZR15’s 2cm minimum.
- Stabilization on EX-ZR15 uses sensor-shift hardware versus digital stabilization on G900; the former better reduces shake.
- Both lack focus bracketing or stacking, limiting true macro control.
Recommendation: For casual macro, EX-ZR15's stabilization helps; G900 suits rugged macro shoots needing weatherproofing.
Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure
- G900’s higher max ISO (6400) and longer max shutter speed (1/4000s vs. EX-ZR15’s 1/2000s) support more flexible night shooting.
- Neither camera supports bulb mode or advanced exposure controls.
- No RAW output precludes advanced noise reduction or stacking techniques.
Recommendation: G900 is clearly better for night and astro setups within compact camera limits.
Video Performance: Specs and Practical Usability
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR15 | Ricoh G900 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | Full HD (1920x1080 at 30fps) | 4K UHD (3840x2160) |
| Frame Rates | Up to 30fps | Up to 30fps |
| Slow Motion | 120-480fps (various resolutions) | Not specified |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| HDMI Output | Yes | Yes |
| Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Digital |
Ricoh G900’s ability to shoot 4K video is a standout advantage for vloggers or video creatives demanding higher resolution footage. The Casio offers excellent slow-motion options albeit at reduced resolution.
Neither camera allows for external microphones - limiting audio control - and stabilization methods differ in impact as discussed.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR15 | Ricoh G900 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | 325 shots per charge | 340 shots per charge |
| Battery Type | NP-110 battery pack | DB-110 lithium-ion + USB charger |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (1) | Internal memory + SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) |
| Connectivity | USB 2.0, HDMI | USB charging, HDMI, supports Toshiba FlashAir wireless SD cards |
| Wireless | None | Indirect via FlashAir card |
| GPS | No | Yes (Built-in) |
In practical use, both cameras have comparable battery performance. However, Ricoh supporting internal storage might be a backup convenience. Its support for FlashAir wireless cards offers a workaround for wireless sharing, albeit less seamless than built-in Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.
GPS add-on is a crucial benefit for travel and outdoor photographers wanting geotagging functionality.
Price-to-Performance: Making Sense of the Investment
| Camera | Launch Price | Current Price (Approx.) | Target User |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casio EX-ZR15 | Approx. $250 | ~$250 | Budget-conscious casual shooters |
| Ricoh G900 | Approx. $750 | ~$750 | Professionals needing rugged, high-quality compact |
At three times the price point, the Ricoh G900 delivers clear enhancements: image quality, weather sealing, 4K video, and ruggedness. The EX-ZR15 remains a budget-friendly compact with respectable features for casual photography.
Real-World Sample Images: Visual Proof in Diverse Scenarios
The above images, captured in varied lighting and subjects, reveal:
- G900’s sharper detail and better rendering in low light.
- EX-ZR15 provides satisfactory color and exposure in daylight but struggles with shadows and noise.
- Bokeh is limited on both due to sensor size, but G900 appears to deliver slightly better tonal gradation.
Scoring the Cameras: A Snapshot of Overall Performance
Here’s a quantified look consolidating our expert review:
| Aspect | EX-ZR15 Score (out of 10) | G900 Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 6 | 8 |
| Autofocus | 5 | 7 |
| Video | 6 | 8 |
| Build & Durability | 4 | 9 |
| Ease of Use | 7 | 7 |
| Battery & Storage | 6 | 7 |
| Value | 7 | 6 |
Choosing by Photography Type: Which Camera Excels Where?
| Photography Genre | Suggested Camera | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Ricoh G900 | Better image quality and face detection |
| Landscape | Ricoh G900 | Higher resolution, weather sealing |
| Wildlife | Ricoh G900 | Faster AF and rugged design |
| Sports | Ricoh G900 | Continuous AF, faster shutter shutter |
| Street | Casio EX-ZR15 | Compact and discreet |
| Macro | Tie (favors EX-ZR15 for stabilization, G900 for focus range) | |
| Night | Ricoh G900 | Higher ISO, better exposure flexibility |
| Video | Ricoh G900 | 4K video capability |
| Travel | Casio EX-ZR15 (for portability), Ricoh G900 (for rugged versatility) | |
| Professional Work | Ricoh G900 | Workflow-friendly features, rugged reliability |
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
When comparing the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh G900, you’re essentially choosing between:
- A lightweight, affordable, user-friendly compact camera perfect for casual travel, street photography, and social snapshots (EX-ZR15).
- A versatile, rugged, higher-resolution compact built to handle tough environments and deliver superior image quality and performance (G900).
If you’re new to photography or seeking a casual point-and-shoot companion, the EX-ZR15 remains a solid choice with decent stabilization and zoom range.
But for seasoned enthusiasts or pros needing a tough, high-function compact that can handle everything from underwater shoots to event videos, the Ricoh G900 justifies its higher cost with robust features and resilience.
Before you buy:
- Try the cameras in person if possible. Ergonomics and experience differ greatly.
- Consider what subjects you shoot most. Focus on the strengths aligned with your style.
- Investigate accessories like protective cases (for EX-ZR15) or FlashAir cards (for G900) to extend usability.
Embarking on a photographic journey is exciting, and the right gear makes all the difference. Whether compact convenience or rugged versatility, both these cameras have something valuable to offer your creativity. We hope this comparison empowers you to make an informed choice.
Happy shooting!
For more technical tests, tips, and hands-on reviews, keep exploring our expert camera guides and sample galleries.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh G900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 shots | 340 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $752 |