Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR15 was introduced 24 months earlier than the WB35F which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR15 matches up versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB35F
EX-ZR15 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-ZR15
WB35F | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | January 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB35F
EX-ZR15 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 offers exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and WB35F.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs but you will need to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB35F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $249 | $130 |