Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung EX2F
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung EX2F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR300 was revealed 7 months before the EX2F so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR300 scores against the EX2F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung EX2F
EX-ZR300 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | 0k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-ZR300
EX2F | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | May 2012 | Fresher by 7 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung EX2F
EX-ZR300 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has specifications of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the EX2F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and EX2F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and EX2F.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR300 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-ZR300 will produce extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung EX2F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $329 | $478 |