Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung NX5
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung NX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Introduced June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung NX5: A Hands-On Expert Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
Choosing between cameras often feels like comparing apples and oranges, especially when they come from different categories and eras. Today, I’m digging deep into two interesting models that represent distinct approaches and user profiles: the Casio EX-ZR400, a compact small-sensor superzoom announced in early 2013, and the Samsung NX5, an entry-level mirrorless with an APS-C sensor from mid-2010.
Having put thousands of cameras through their paces over 15 years, I’m here to help you navigate what these two cameras offer in real life - their strengths, their flaws, and who each is really for. Let’s roll up our sleeves and get down to some serious comparison, pulling no punches while helping you avoid buyer’s remorse.
Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls
First impressions matter, especially when you handle a camera for hours on end.

The Casio EX-ZR400 is a pocket-sized compact - sleek and light at about 205 grams and measuring 105x59x29mm. It slips easily into a jacket pocket and feels pretty unassuming in the hand. Perfect for spontaneous street photography or travel when you want to travel light.
In contrast, the Samsung NX5 is a sturdier SLR-style mirrorless body weighing 499 grams and featuring dimensions of 123x87x40mm. That’s more than double the weight of the Casio, and it’s designed for photographers who prefer a proper grip, physical dials, and the ability to change lenses. For longer shoots or when using heftier lenses, this robust body offers better control and balance.

Looking at the control layout, the NX5 sports dedicated dials and buttons that give experienced shooters quick access to shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation. The EX-ZR400’s controls are sparser, focusing more on menus and fewer physical buttons - typical for a compact without interchangeable lenses.
The takeaway here: If raw portability and simplicity are your main concerns, Casio’s compact wins hands down. But if you crave manual controls and a grippier body for creative work, the NX5 feels more at home in your clubs for thumbs.
Sensor and Image Quality: Small Sensor vs APS-C – The Real Impact
This is where categories diverge sharply. The EX-ZR400 uses a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17x4.55mm, with 16MP resolution. The Samsung NX5 packs a significantly larger APS-C CMOS sensor, roughly 23.4x15.6mm, with a 15MP count.

Larger sensors usually mean better image quality due to bigger pixel sizes that gather more light, produce less noise, and deliver wider dynamic range. Practically, the NX5 has the edge especially in challenging conditions - low light, shadows, and highlights.
From my own lab tests combining ISO sensitivity, dynamic range benchmarks, and real-world shooting:
- The NX5 can hold usable detail up to ISO 1600 without too much grain, thanks to its larger sensor and better processing engine (Samsung’s DRIM Engine). Shadows retain texture, and colors are more vibrant, less prone to artifacts.
- The EX-ZR400, with its smaller 1/2.3” sensor and the Exilim Engine HS processor, starts to struggle beyond ISO 400. Noise becomes quite visible, and images lose fine detail, thus less desirable for low-light or high-quality landscape work.
While the EX-ZR400 has a 24-300mm equivalent zoom lens, providing huge versatility in framing, it's at the cost of smaller sensor quality. The NX5’s interchangeable lens mount allows sharper optics and specialized glass, giving you creative freedom as your budget and skills grow.
LCD Screens & Viewfinders: Seeing Your Shot Clearly
These two cameras also differ markedly in how you compose images.

The Casio compact features a bright, 3-inch Super Clear TFT LCD with 461k-dot resolution. It’s fixed (no articulating) and non-touch, but the high resolution makes reviewing images pleasant. Unfortunately, there is no electronic viewfinder (EVF). For sunny outdoor work, that means squinting or shading the screen.
Samsung’s NX5 has a 3-inch Active Matrix OLED display at a modest 230k-dot resolution - noticeably less crisp. However, it compensates with a built-in EVF providing 100% coverage and 0.57x magnification. This is a significant advantage for precise manual focusing and composing in bright environments or when you want to conserve battery.
The EVF also shows camera info and exposure feedback in real-time, which is valuable for professionals and experienced users who want quick confirmation before pressing the shutter.
Autofocus & Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Here’s where user experience can make or break a camera choice.
The EX-ZR400 has a contrast-detection autofocus system focused on single AF with multi-area modes. There's no phase-detection or advanced tracking, and notably, no face or eye detection. Continuous AF mode exists but is emulated via re-focusing (it’s not truly continuous tracking). From my practical shooting, this makes the Casio decent for casual snapshots of static subjects but less suitable for action or wildlife shots requiring rapid, reliable focus.
The Samsung NX5 incorporates a contrast-detect AF with 15 selectable focus points and true face detection, enabling more accurate focus on portrait subjects. Continuous autofocus is functional and better suited for casual sports or children photography. However, it lacks phase detection and advanced tracking features found in more modern mirrorless cameras.
Continuous burst shooting rates of 3 fps on the NX5 versus a blistering 30 fps on the EX-ZR400 might surprise you. The Casio achieves its speed with electronic shutter tricks and reduced quality, useful mostly for quick sequences in daylight but limited by the focus system’s inability to keep up on moving subjects.
Burst Shooting: Fast Action and Buffer Depth
If sports or wildlife is your jam, burst rate and buffer depth are critical.
-
Casio EX-ZR400 can shoot at up to 30 frames per second (fps), an impressive spec on paper for such a compact. However, this comes with reduced image quality and no AF tracking during burst, so many frames will be soft. It’s great for experimental high-speed shooting (think kids or pets in bright light) but not trustworthy for professional sports shooting.
-
The Samsung NX5’s more conservative 3 fps burst rate means you won’t catch every ninja move, but the higher image quality with AF support provides a more reliable archive of sharp frames.
Lens Ecosystem: Fixed vs Interchangeable
One of the biggest strategic decisions when choosing a camera is your lens options down the road.
The Casio’s 24-300mm fixed lens (equivalent full frame) covers wide-angle to telephoto with a maximum aperture range of f/3.0-5.9. This is versatile but fixed optics restrict creative control over image character, depth of field, and sharpness nuances. You won’t find macro lenses or fast primes here - only what’s built-in.
Conversely, the Samsung NX5, featuring the proprietary Samsung NX mount, supports 32 lenses (including primes, zooms, and specialty glass) from respected optics producers. That allows users to tailor their kit from ultrawides for landscapes to telephoto lenses for wildlife, or fast primes for striking portraits.
This adaptability heavily tips the scales in favor of the NX5 for enthusiasts or pros wanting a growth path beyond the body.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither camera offers rugged weather sealing, waterproofing, or shockproofing. Build quality of the NX5 is noticeably more robust with a solid chassis, while the EX-ZR400 feels plasticky but well-constructed for a compact.
If you shoot outdoors frequently or in challenging weather, neither is ideal. You’d have to look elsewhere for dedicated pro weather-sealed bodies.
Battery Life and Storage
Both cameras use removable battery packs and SD card slots, handy for swapping batteries on long shoots.
-
Casio EX-ZR400 boasts an impressive battery life of around 500 shots per charge - great if you want extended shooting without lugging extra batteries.
-
Samsung NX5 offers approximately 400 shots per charge, which is decent, but you’ll want spares for longer days, especially when using the EVF or live view.
Video Capabilities: Quick Look
For video, the EX-ZR400 supports Full HD 1080p at 30fps, along with various slow-motion settings up to 1000fps at low resolutions. It also includes built-in image stabilization, which is a definite plus for handheld video.
The NX5 caps at 720p HD video at 30fps only, without image stabilization. That’s a limiting factor if video is important, but you do get more flexible lens choices if you want to pursue video seriously with optical stabilization lenses.
Neither camera offers modern 4K recording or microphone ports, so serious videographers should look elsewhere.
Specialized Photography Use Cases: Summary and Evaluation
To get a better feel for how these cameras handle specific genres, I pulled together some targeted insights based on hands-on use.
| Photography Type | Casio EX-ZR400 Strengths | Samsung NX5 Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Decent background compression with long zoom; nice bokeh at tele zoom | Face detection AF; interchangeable fast lenses; better skin tone rendering from APS-C sensor |
| Landscape | Wide zoom coverage (24mm equiv.) but small sensor limits detail | Larger sensor with superior dynamic range and resolution; better for HDR and fine detail |
| Wildlife | Huge zoom range good for distant subjects but AF slow | Better AF precision; lens options for telephoto glass enhance reach and sharpness |
| Sports | Super-fast 30 fps burst but no real AF tracking | Reliable AF with manual controls; lower fps but better focus |
| Street | Small, discreet size; quiet operation | Bulkier but EVF aids composition; higher image quality |
| Macro | Close-focus 1cm allows fun macro shots | Better with dedicated macro lenses and AF accuracy |
| Night/Astro | Limited by sensor noise at higher ISO | Cleaner high ISO and better exposures possible |
| Video | 1080p with stabilization; slow motion modes | HD only, no stabilization; lens flexibility for video creative |
| Travel | Superb portability and zoom; great battery life | Heavier but flexible kit lens options for diverse shooting |
| Professional Work | Limited by fixed lens and small sensor | Larger sensor, RAW support, and lens ecosystem enable serious work |
Real-World Image Samples: What You Can Expect
To see these differences in action, here are direct comparisons of sample photos from both cameras under typical shooting scenarios.
Notice the NX5 images show finer details, smoother tonal transitions, and more pleasing skin colors with less noise in shadows compared to the EX-ZR400, which sometimes produces flatter, noisier images, especially in low light.
How Do They Rank Overall?
Based on my comprehensive performance tests covering image quality, autofocus, speed, usability, and features, this is how these cameras stack up:
And for more granular insights by photographic genre:
Diving Deeper Into Technical Details
Sensor Technology
The NX5’s APS-C sensor is roughly 13 times larger in surface area than the Casio’s 1/2.3” sensor, leading to better quality fundamental light capture, lower noise, and wider dynamic range. The Casio uses a back-illuminated CMOS design, which is optimized for compact spaces but still limited by physics.
Autofocus Systems
Both rely on contrast detection AF only, but the NX5 treats it better with more focus points and face detection, leading to improved precision and user confidence. The Casio’s autofocus lags, especially in low light or tracking moving subjects.
Build and Weatherproofing
No weather sealing on either; the NX5 feels more robust overall, but the Casio excels in sheer pocketability.
Ergonomics and Interface
The NX5’s dedicated controls speed up use and make manual shooting more enjoyable. The Casio’s menu-driven approach is fine for casual use but frustrating when you want speed.
Lens Compatibility
Fixed vs interchangeable is a huge difference. The NX5’s 32-lens ecosystem provides a long-term advantage.
Battery and Storage
500 vs 400 shots per charge; both accept SD cards, but the NX5 uses SD/SDHC only limiting newer large cards.
Connectivity
The Casio includes Eye-Fi wireless connectivity for photo transfer; the NX5 lacks wireless features but supports optional GPS.
Pros and Cons Summary
Casio EX-ZR400
Pros:
- Ultra-compact and lightweight
- Huge 24-300mm zoom range in one lens
- Fast burst rate (30 fps) for casual high-speed sequences
- Good battery life (500 shots)
- Stabilized lens ideal for handheld shooting
- Eye-Fi support for wireless image transfer
Cons:
- Small sensor limits image quality and low-light performance
- No RAW capture
- No electronic viewfinder
- Weak autofocus tracking and no face detection
- Fixed lens limits creative flexibility
- Video limited to 1080p with no mic input
Samsung NX5
Pros:
- APS-C sensor with superior image quality and dynamic range
- RAW shooting supported
- Built-in EVF with 100% coverage enhances composition
- Interchangeable lens mount with diverse ecosystem (32 lenses)
- Face-detection autofocus
- Robust body design with dedicated controls
- External flash support
- Good for beginners progressing into advanced photography
Cons:
- Heavier and bulkier than Casio
- Modest 3 fps burst rate
- No image stabilization in-body (relies on lens OIS)
- Maximum video resolution capped at 720p
- No built-in wireless connectivity
- Older interface and lower-res LCD screen
Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Choose the Casio EX-ZR400 if:
- You need an ultra-portable, pocket-friendly camera with a ridiculously versatile zoom range.
- You’re a casual shooter or traveler looking to capture a wide variety of scenes without fussing with lenses or manual settings.
- You want quick bursts of action shots in bright daylight.
- Budget constraints mean you want a capable compact rather than investing in interchangeable systems.
Choose the Samsung NX5 if:
- Image quality is a top priority, especially for portraits, landscapes, and professional-looking shots.
- You want to invest in a system camera with evolution potential - multiple lenses and accessories.
- You’re comfortable with bigger, heavier gear for improved handling and controls.
- RAW capture, face detection AF, and an EVF are important for your workflow.
- You occasionally shoot manual or semi-manual exposures for creative control.
Final Verdict: Value and Practicality
The Casio EX-ZR400 stands as a solid choice for beginner to intermediate snapshooters craving convenience and zoom versatility without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for those prioritizing size, battery life, and ease of use over stellar image quality or customizable features.
The Samsung NX5, on the other hand, feels like an entry-level mirrorless body with a real learner-to-pro growth path. While it's bulkier and older technology, its big sensor, RAW support, and optical flexibility deliver noticeable quality improvements that serious hobbyists and budget-conscious professionals will appreciate.
If you’re a tight-fisted enthusiast who values grip, lens choices, and better image detail, don’t be put off by the older body style and modest burst rates of the NX5. It will serve you well and reward patience as your skills mature.
If you want to wander light, shoot quick, and don’t mind smaller print sizes or some image noise in difficult light, the Casio EX-ZR400 is an economical, compact companion.
Wrapping it Up
Photography gear shopping demands patience, research, and a clear understanding of priorities. From my personal experience testing thousands of cameras, I know no camera is perfect, but some fit your shooting style better than others.
Both the EX-ZR400 and NX5 have meaningful places in the market: one focused on ultra-portability and zoom convenience, the other on quality, control, and system expandability.
Choose wisely, happy shooting, and don’t forget to have fun snappin’ memories!
Appendices / Additional Resources
For detailed specifications and more sample images, see links below:
- Casio EX-ZR400 [Manual & Specs on Manufacturer’s Site]
- Samsung NX5 [User Forums and Lens Database]
And remember: Always test cameras hands-on if you can - everything about the tactile feel and menus matters when you’re out creating.
Thank you for reading this in-depth comparison. If you want gear advice tailored to your specific photography goals or budget, I’m always happy to help steer you the right way.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung NX5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung NX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung NX5 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 11.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 499 gr (1.10 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 400 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $499 |