Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon A900
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Later Model is Nikon A1000
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon A900 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR700 was manufactured 4 years before the A900 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR700 grades vs the A900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Nikon Coolpix A900. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Nikon A900
EX-ZR700 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 921k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Casio EX-ZR700
A900 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | January 2013 | More modern by 37 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon A900
EX-ZR700 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Nikon A900 has dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon A900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the A900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and A900 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The image underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and A900.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Nikon A900 to produce extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR700 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.4-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 300 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $370 | $400 |