Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon P950
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon P950 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
Nikon P950
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Introduced January 2020
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon P950 Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Nikon P950, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the P950 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR700 was introduced 8 years before the P950 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the P950 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon P950 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Nikon Coolpix P950. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Nikon P950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Nikon P950
| EX-ZR700 | P950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 921k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| P950 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2020 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 84 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Nikon P950
| EX-ZR700 | P950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon P950 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers physical measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Nikon P950 has proportions of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") and a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Nikon P950 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the P950.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and P950 is 91 and 52 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon P950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The picture here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and P950.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photos but you really should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR700 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon P950 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography factors
Nikon P950 Portrait photography factors
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Street photography camera
Nikon P950 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (1,005 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography details
Nikon P950 Sports photography details
incredible zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
good battery pack (470 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (24-2000mm 83.3 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Travel photography with Nikon P950
good battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
has bluetooth
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (2000mm)
heavier than competition (1,005 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Landscape photography camera
Nikon P950 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good battery pack (470 CIPA)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3.2")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Vlogging camera
Nikon P950 as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone port
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external mic port
slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition (1,005 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Nikon P950 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix P950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2020-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 90% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 1005g (2.22 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | 290 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $370 | $797 |