Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh G900
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh G900
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2018
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh G900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-ZR700 was announced 6 years prior to the G900 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR700 matches up vs the G900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh G900
| EX-ZR700 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| G900 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2018 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 61 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 922k | Crisper display (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh G900
| EX-ZR700 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 has outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Ricoh G900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the G900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and G900 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR700 and G900.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh G900 to offer you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-ZR700 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh G900 Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
supports face detect focusing
manual mode not available
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR700
Street photography with Ricoh G900
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (222g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
built in image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (247 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Sports photography features
Ricoh G900 Sports photography features
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers tracking focus
good battery power (470 shots)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
supports tracking focus
weather proof
better than average battery life (340 per charge)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Travel photography factors
Ricoh G900 Travel photography factors
good battery power (470 shots)
lighter than average in class (222 grams)
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
great zoom (450mm)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
better than average battery life (340 shots)
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
heavier than competition in class (247 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh G900 Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
good battery power (470 per charge)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse function
manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
weather proof
better than average battery life (340 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR700
Vlogging with Ricoh G900
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (222g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing microphone port
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
missing mic socket
heavier than competition in class (247 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh G900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 340 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $370 | $752 |
