Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR700 was announced 2 years after the ST95 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR700 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR700 scores versus the ST95 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung ST95
EX-ZR700 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-ZR700
ST95 | EX-ZR700 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung ST95
EX-ZR700 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 has outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the ST95.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR700 and ST95 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and ST95.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution and you should expect comparable quality of photos but you should consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer EX-ZR700 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST95 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $370 | $145 |