Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-30W
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
Ricoh WG-30W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-30W, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR800 was announced 14 months prior to the WG-30W which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the WG-30W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Ricoh WG-30W. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-ZR800 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WG-30W | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 |  | August 2013 | Newer by 14 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-ZR800 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got outside measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-30W has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-30W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR800 compared to the WG-30W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and WG-30W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR800 and WG-30W.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of pictures but you will want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR800 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-30W
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-30W Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (222g)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-30W
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (470 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography information
Ricoh WG-30W Travel photography information
better than average battery life (470 shots)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very long reach (450mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
weather proofing
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-30W Landscape photography highlights
focusing manually
fairly wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
better than average battery life (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-30W as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $429 | $280 |