Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
Samsung HZ30W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as WB600
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 3 years later than the HZ30W and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the EX-ZR800 matches up versus the HZ30W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung HZ30W. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung HZ30W
| EX-ZR800 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 44 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Casio EX-ZR800
| HZ30W | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung HZ30W
| EX-ZR800 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 features physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung HZ30W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the HZ30W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and HZ30W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by going through specs. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and HZ30W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR800 to show more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR800 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography features
Samsung HZ30W Portrait photography features
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
includes face detect focus
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
manual focus
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ30W Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (222 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (245g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Sports photography features
Samsung HZ30W Sports photography features
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
great battery life (470 CIPA)
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography information
Samsung HZ30W Travel photography information
great battery life (470 shots)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
great reach (450mm)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others (245 grams)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ30W as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
decently wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
great battery life (470 per charge)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging highlights
Samsung HZ30W Vlogging highlights
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (222g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have mic socket
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (245g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB600 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $429 | $280 |