Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST100
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST100, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 3 years after the ST100 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR800 scores against the ST100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST100. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST100
| EX-ZR800 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 44 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| ST100 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 922k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST100
| EX-ZR800 | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung ST100 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST100 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the ST100.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and ST100 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and ST100.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR800 to give you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 922k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $429 | $250 |