Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR800 was introduced 2 years later than the ST65 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the ST65 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung ST65. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST65
EX-ZR800 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 32 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-ZR800
ST65 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST65
EX-ZR800 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the ST65.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and ST65 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing specifications. The photograph here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and ST65.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to produce extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST65 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 4cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $429 | $130 |