Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daa88/daa88bfe6d889d427e008123c5647754bbcdb923" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37590/375904798060e97eb5dfbb02b75093afb956586f" alt="Samsung TL210 front Samsung TL210 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternate Name is PL150
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL210, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and TL210 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-ZR800 was launched 3 years later than the TL210 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the TL210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung TL210. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung TL210
EX-ZR800 | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 44 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Casio EX-ZR800
TL210 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL210
EX-ZR800 | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got exterior measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung TL210 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung TL210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR800 vs the TL210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67311/673118b959e09d72063fe4d2d73c52df104a9654" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and TL210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81f05/81f0562ddcff91ad0364a8f352e8d82d09d4f411" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and TL210.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29ea8/29ea864aeb830a50be25f074bd027c7084967d19" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b584/2b584fc8137f97f5d7c15d89c29846e04a0505c5" alt="Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung TL210 |
Alternative name | - | PL150 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 4cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 177 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-07B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $429 | $230 |