Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ1
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Replacement is Fujifilm XQ2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ1 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm XQ1, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) is very close but the TRYX (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") provide totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TRYX was announced 3 years prior to the Fujifilm XQ1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the TRYX matches up versus the Fujifilm XQ1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim TRYX & Fujifilm XQ1. The whole galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm XQ1
| TRYX | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm XQ1 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 35 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm XQ1
| TRYX | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ1 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio TRYX features outside measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Fujifilm XQ1 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm XQ1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TRYX versus the Fujifilm XQ1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and Fujifilm XQ1 is 99 and 92 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The image below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TRYX and Fujifilm XQ1.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The TRYX has the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder. The more aged TRYX will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm XQ1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm XQ1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2013-11-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS II |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-48 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $689 | $500 |