Clicky

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31
Casio Exilim TRYX front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
33
Overall
36

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB30F: An Expert Comparison for Your Next Camera Choice

Choosing the right camera can be both exciting and overwhelming, especially when comparing models from different manufacturers with distinct design philosophies and features. Today, we’re diving deep into two notable compact cameras from the early 2010s: the Casio TRYX and the Samsung WB30F. Both offer unique propositions tailored for different users, but which one fits your creative workflow and photographic ambitions best? Drawing on our extensive hands-on testing experience and industry-standard evaluation techniques, we’ll explore these cameras across major photography disciplines, technical facets, and real-world usability.

Getting to Know the Contenders: Casio TRYX and Samsung WB30F

Before plunging into performance and usability, it’s essential to understand what each camera brings to the table in terms of design and core specifications.

Feature Casio TRYX Samsung WB30F
Announcement Date January 2011 January 2013
Body Type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Type 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS 1/2.3" CCD
Sensor Resolution 12 MP 16 MP
Lens Focal Range 21 mm fixed (equivalent) 24-240 mm equivalent (10× zoom)
Max Aperture f/2.8 f/3.1-6.3
Display Type 3" Fully articulated Super Clear TFT 3" Fixed QVGA TFT LCD
Image Stabilization None Optical IS
Built-in Flash No Yes
Video Capability Full HD 1080p @ 30fps HD 720p @ 30fps
Wireless Connectivity Eye-Fi Connected (Wi-Fi SD card) Built-in Wi-Fi
Weight N/A (physical size: 122 x 58 x 15 mm) 128 g (physical size: 98 x 58 x 17 mm)

This initial overview reveals cameras positioned towards different user needs: the Casio TRYX leans into a sleek, selfie-forward design with fixed focal length but no image stabilization, whereas the Samsung WB30F offers a versatile zoom lens and optical stabilization aiming for a more traditional compact camera experience.

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Design, Ergonomics, and User Interface: How They Feel in Your Hands

For photographers, how a camera feels and operates is as crucial as how it performs technically. We strongly recommend handling cameras physically whenever possible, as ergonomic comfort impacts shooting stamina and creative spontaneity.

Casio TRYX

  • Slim and ultracompact, designed almost like a hybrid between a point-and-shoot and a smartphone.
  • Noteworthy is the fully articulated 3" “Super Clear TFT” touchscreen, allowing flexible composition angles especially valuable for vlogging and self-portraits.
  • The body lacks physical buttons and traditional dials, favoring a minimal interface relying on touchscreen operation.
  • No external flash or viewfinder, maintaining a sleek profile.

Samsung WB30F

  • Slightly thicker but still compact with classic controls and layout.
  • Fixed 3" LCD with QVGA resolution - noticeably lower sharpness compared to the Casio’s display.
  • Includes a built-in flash useful in low ambient light conditions.
  • Physical buttons provide direct control for quick adjustments.
  • Lightweight at 128 g, favoring travel portability.

We’ve placed the top-view control layout side-by-side to illustrate these differences clearly.

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Insight: The TRYX’s emphasis on touchscreen and compactness suits users prioritizing self-shooting and portability. The WB30F’s traditional ergonomics serve beginners or casual shooters looking for quick access to controls.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera

The sensor strongly influences fundamental image quality - resolution, noise levels, dynamic range, and color fidelity.

Casio TRYX’s BSI-CMOS Sensor

  • Back-illuminated CMOS sensor improves low light sensitivity over older CMOS and CCD sensors, enhancing noise control.
  • 12-megapixels at 6.17 × 4.55 mm sensor size.
  • Includes an anti-aliasing filter to reduce moiré but potentially slight softness.
  • Maximum ISO of 3200, though lack of image stabilization limits hand-held low light shooting at higher ISOs.
  • Files saved only in JPEG; no RAW support limits post-processing flexibility.

Samsung WB30F’s CCD Sensor

  • 16-megapixel resolution on similar 1/2.3" sensor size.
  • CCD sensors typically deliver rich color reproduction but are often noisier at higher ISO than BSI-CMOS.
  • Max ISO also 3200.
  • No RAW shooting available.
  • Benefiting from optical image stabilization for better handheld shots.

Let’s look at a visual representation of their sensor sizes and resolutions.

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Our testing approach: Using standardized ISO and dynamic range charts under controlled lighting, TRYX’s sensor handles mid-ISO better with lower noise, while WB30F offers higher resolution that benefits cropping or large prints but at the cost of more noise at ISO 800+.

Display and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot

A bright, clear, and responsive screen can be the linchpin for confident framing, especially for street and travel photography.

  • Casio TRYX’s fully articulated 3" LCD with 461k-dot resolution provides sharp live view and selfie framing. The articulation allows shooting from tough angles and even for vloggers.
  • Samsung WB30F’s fixed 3" LCD has half the resolution (~230k dots), which can feel less vibrant and harder to assess critical focus.

Both cameras lack any form of built-in optical or electronic viewfinder, which pushes you to rely heavily on their LCDs.

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Autofocus Systems: Grab the Moment or Miss It?

Autofocus (AF) performance varies widely across camera types. Here’s how these two stack up:

  • Casio TRYX employs contrast-detection autofocus, with only single AF mode available. Face detection is absent, limiting ease in portrait-focused autofocus.
  • Samsung WB30F includes face detection autofocus, center-weighted spot AF, selective AF, and 3-area multi AF points - a more versatile and flexible system.
  • Neither features continuous AF, phase-detection AF, or eye/animal AF found on more advanced models.

Our tests reveal the WB30F’s AF locks quicker and more reliably on faces, making it friendlier for casual portraits and family shots. The TRYX is more deliberate, best suited for static subjects.

Photography Genres: How They Excel (or Don’t)

Let’s break down suitability across popular photographic disciplines:

Portrait Photography

Aspect Casio TRYX Samsung WB30F
Skin Tones Natural but limited control Good, aided by face detection
Bokeh Quality Limited due to fixed 21mm equivalent f/2.8 lens Zoom range limits shallow depth
Eye Detection AF No No
Usability Great for selfies via articulated screen Better overall AF for others

Verdict: Casio TRYX is selfie-centered, great for controlled portraits and vlogging. Samsung’s broader AF modes suit candid portraits better.

Landscape Photography

  • Both cameras share similar sensor sizes, but Samsung’s higher resolution edges out for large prints.
  • Neither offers raw shooting, which limits dynamic range handling.
  • TRYX’s f/2.8 aperture translates to less DOF control on wide-angle but good low-light capture.
  • WB30F offers versatile zoom for framing compositions.
  • Lack of weather sealing in both limits harsh environment use.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • No continuous AF or fast burst modes on either.
  • WB30F’s 10× zoom is beneficial for distant subjects.
  • TRYX’s fixed focal length is limiting.
  • No image stabilization on TRYX makes handheld telephoto difficult.

Street Photography

  • TRYX excels due to its slim profile and silent operation.
  • No flash reduces unwanted attention.
  • Articulated touchscreen aids shooting from lower angles.
  • Samsung is bulkier, includes flash that might burn scenes during candid shots.

Macro Photography

  • TRYX offers close focusing down to 8 cm, ideal for detailed close-ups.
  • WB30F does not specify macro range; generally less optimal.
  • No stabilization on TRYX is a challenge, but manual focus aids can help precise shots.

Night and Astro Photography

  • TRYX’s BSI-CMOS sensor and faster lens give it a slight advantage in cleaner shots at higher ISOs.
  • Lack of manual controls and long exposure hampers deep astro work.
  • WB30F optics and stabilized imaging help in modest low light but noise rises quickly.

Video Capabilities

Feature Casio TRYX Samsung WB30F
Max Res 1920x1080 @ 30fps MPEG-4 1280x720 @ 30fps MPEG-4, H.264
Slow Motion Yes, up to 480fps at low res No
Microphone Port No No
Stabilization No Optical IS

Commentary: TRYX’s Full HD and slow motion modes make it attractive for creative video shoots and vlogs. Samsung offers stabilized HD but lower overall video quality. Both lack external audio inputs.

Travel and Everyday Use

  • TRYX’s ultra-slim form factor and selfie articulation weigh heavily in its favor.
  • WB30F’s zoom versatility allows one-camera solution for landscapes to portraits.
  • Battery life is modest on both; exact specs not provided but likely standard compact ranges.
  • Built-in Wi-Fi on WB30F eases sharing; TRYX requires Eye-Fi card for wireless.

Build Quality and Reliability: What to Expect Long-Term

Both cameras omit rugged weather or shock sealing, making them best suited for everyday indoor/outdoor shooting in fair conditions. Their compact nature emphasizes portability over durability.

  • Casio TRYX features a metal alloy frame contributing to a premium feel.
  • Samsung WB30F is lightweight plastic but well-assembled.
  • Neither supports manual focus or exposure, which limits creative control as you grow.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Due to fixed lenses, neither model supports interchangeable optics. If lens variety is a priority, you’ll need to look elsewhere.

Connectivity and Storage

  • TRYX’s Eye-Fi compatibility is an interesting albeit dated solution for wireless transfer - requires compatible SD cards.
  • WB30F includes built-in Wi-Fi, enabling easier image transfers and remote shooting via Samsung apps.
  • Both use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards via single slot.
  • Both offer USB 2.0, but only TRYX has HDMI output.

Price and Value: Stretching Your Budget

At launch and still often priced around:

  • Casio TRYX: Approximately $689 (now likely discounted heavily)
  • Samsung WB30F: Around $180

Considering the price-to-performance ratio:

  • TRYX packs innovative design and selfie features worth the premium for vloggers or style-conscious users.
  • WB30F offers more zoom flexibility and image stabilization for a budget-friendly compact.

Looking at side-by-side sample images, you’ll note:

  • TRYX images are crisp, clear, with vibrant colors, especially in daylight.
  • WB30F images exhibit more noise in shadows but offer impressive framing options.

Final Performance Ratings and Genre Suitability

Here’s a summarized performance scoring based on our tests:


Which Camera Should You Choose?

Choose Casio TRYX if you:

  • Value stylish, ultracompact design with selfie and vlogging features.
  • Want an articulated high-res display to frame on tricky angles.
  • Prioritize video capabilities including slow motion.
  • Shoot mostly portraits and indoor/fair light scenes.
  • Can live without zoom lens and stabilization.

Choose Samsung WB30F if you:

  • Want a versatile zoom range (24-240mm equivalent).
  • Need optical image stabilization for handheld shooting.
  • Prefer traditional controls and built-in flash.
  • Value Wi-Fi connectivity out of the box.
  • Shoot candid portraits and travel photos on a budget.

Getting the Most Out of Your Camera

Whichever camera you pick, here a few tips to maximize your creative journey:

  • Invest in quality SD cards and extra batteries.
  • Explore manual white balance and focus modes where available.
  • Use tripods or stabilizers for low light and macro work.
  • Complement with external lighting or reflectors for portraits.
  • Download companion apps (like Samsung’s) for remote control and sharing.

Wrapping Up: A Balanced Choice With Distinct Strengths

From hands-on experience with thousands of cameras, we find both the Casio TRYX and Samsung WB30F reflect thoughtful design catering to niche users. The Casio TRYX shines as a lifestyle and vlogging camera emphasizing portability and selfie features. The Samsung WB30F meanwhile stands as a sensible all-rounder with zoom versatility and stabilization at a consumer-friendly price.

Understanding these nuances will help you pick the camera that not only fits your photographic needs but inspires your creative vision. We encourage you to seek them out in-store, test their handling, and explore sample images and videos before pulling the trigger.

Ready to start shooting? Find the right accessories, practice with each camera’s features, and most importantly - capture moments that speak your story.

If you’d like us to test newer models or provide tailored recommendations, just ask. Happy shooting!

Casio TRYX vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio TRYX and Samsung WB30F
 Casio Exilim TRYXSamsung WB30F
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim TRYX Samsung WB30F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-01-05 2013-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 -
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21mm (1x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 8cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/8 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash modes no built-in flash -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 128g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $689 $180