FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Below, we will be matching up the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe AV200 was revealed 24 months earlier than the TG-830 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the AV200 matches up versus the TG-830 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| AV200 | TG-830 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the FujiFilm AV200
| TG-830 iHS | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 24 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| AV200 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 has got exterior dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the AV200 versus the TG-830 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and TG-830 iHS is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specs. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV200 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-830 iHS to give you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged AV200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Also called | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $0 |
